Modified Paramedic Sagittal vs. Transverse TMQLB

April 15, 2019 updated by: Cui Xulei, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Randomized Prospective Study to Evaluate Cranial Dermatomal Spread of Modified Paramedic Sagittal Versus Transverse Approach TMQLB for Adrenal Surgery

The classical transmuscular qudratus lumborum block(TMQLB) described by Borglum aims to provide lower thoracic paravertebral space(PVS) and sympathetic blockade by injecting local anesthetics between QL and PM muscle at the L3-L4 vertebral level using a transverse scan, posterior-anterior, in-plane approach. Recently, a paramedian sagittal oblique(TMQLB) approach has been introduced to facilitate cranial spread by injecting the local in a caudal to cranial direction. Currently, there are no data comparing the two techniques mentioned above with regards to extent of spread for PVS. Our objective is to investigate the extent of cranial dermatomal spread of TMQLB when equal dosage(ml/kg) of local anesthetic are injected with the transverse versus an modified paramedian sagittal approach for patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. In addition, the investigators wish to compare the performance time, caudal dermatomal spread of TMQLB and postoperative analgesia effect.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 yrs
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ
  • Undergo laparoscopic adrenalectomy
  • Informed consent
  • Able to cooperate with study process

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetic and other medications used in the study
  • Patient refusal or lack of informed consent
  • Coexisting hematological disorder or with deranged coagulation parameters
  • Pre-existing major organ dysfunction such as hepatic and renal failure
  • History of previous renal surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: transverse TMQLB
Patients in this group will receive the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block before surgery using the transverse scan, in-plain, posterior to anterior approach. 0.6ml 0.375% ropivocaine was injected when the correct needle location is confirmed.
Procedure: transverse scan, in-plane, posterior-anterior TMQLB
The patients will receive the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block(TMQLB) before surgery using the transverse scan, in-plain, posterior to anterior approach. 0.6ml/kg 0.375% ropivocaine is injected when the correct needle location is confirmed.
Experimental: paramedian sagittal TMQLB
Patients in this group will receive the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block before surgery using the para-sagittal scan, in-plain, caudal to cephalic approach.0.6ml 0.375% ropivocaine was injected when the correct needle location is confirmed.
Procedure: paramedian sagittal scan, in-plane, caudal-cranial TMQLB
The patients will receive the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block(TMQLB) before surgery using the paramedic sagittal scan, in-plain, caudal-cephalic approach.0.6ml/kg 0.375% ropivocaine is injected when the correct needle location is confirmed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cephalic sensory dermatomal spread
Time Frame: 20 minutes after block performance
20 minutes after block performance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to performance of procedure
Time Frame: Duration of procedure
Duration of procedure
Total sensory dermatomal spread
Time Frame: 20 minutes after block performance
20 minutes after block performance
Incidence of complication
Time Frame: Within 48hours after surgery
Within 48hours after surgery
Caudal sensory dermatomal spread
Time Frame: 20 minutes after block performance
20 minutes after block performance
cumulative rate of rescue analgesics usage
Time Frame: At 0,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after surgery
At 0,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after surgery
NRS pain scores
Time Frame: At 0,2,4,8,12,24,48hours after surgery
patients will evaluate their pain intensity with the numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates the most severe pain.
At 0,2,4,8,12,24,48hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xulei Cui, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • cuixule6

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings