Observational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Teneligliptin

January 24, 2025 updated by: Handok Inc.

Observational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Teneligliptin When Switched From Other DPP-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 DM With Inadequate Glycemic Control

This study is designed as a prospective, observational, multi-centre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Teneligliptin when switched from other DPP-4 inhibitors in type 2 DM with inadequate glycemic control

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2983

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi
      • Suwon, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of
        • Ajou University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Type 2 DM patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is aged ≥19 years
  2. The subject has a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 3 months at the screening visit.
  3. Patient who was treated with same dosage of DPP4 inhibitor for at least 12 weeks prior to baseline visit (if patient who has been treated with DPP4 inhibitor and any other antidiabetic drugs, antidiabetic drugs should also have been kept same dosage for at least 12 weeks prior to baseline.)
  4. Patient with HbA1c≥7.0% at baseline visit
  5. Patient who can be switched to Teneligliptin instead of using DPP-4 inhibitor for glycemic control based on the investigator's judgment
  6. Patient (or legal guardian, if applicable) is informed of the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and side effects, and understand this information, voluntarily signed and dated the written informed consent in compliance with protocol before inclusion in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with hypersensitivity to the Teneligliptin
  2. Patient who treat the Teneligliptin prior to baseline visit
  3. A pregnant or lactating female patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: at 12 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
To assess change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
at 12 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: at 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
To assess change from baseline in HbA1c
at 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
Change in FBG
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
To assess change from baseline in fasting blood glucose (FBG)
at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
Change in body weight, BMI
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
To assess change from baseline in body weight and body mass index (BMI)
at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
Change in lipid profile(Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol)
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
To assess change from baseline in serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglyceride)
at 12, 24, 52 weeks after switching to Teneligliptin
The percentage of patients with HbA1c <7.0% and <6.5%
Time Frame: at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment
To assess the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7.0% and <6.5%
at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment
The percentage of patients with a decrease from baseline in HbA1c
Time Frame: at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment
To assess the percentage of patients with a decrease from baseline in HbA1c by ≥0.3% and ≥ 0.5%
at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment
Safety Outcome
Time Frame: at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment
To assess the safety of teneligliptin treatment(AE, ADR, SAE etc.)
at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 of teneligliptin treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Handok Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kwan Woo Lee, MD, Ph.D, Ajou University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 5, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HD_TEN_OS2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings