Prognostic Impact of Delta-haemolysin Production Deficiency in Staphylococcus Aureus on the Prognosis of Infected Implant Treated by DAIR
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Johanna Boulant, CRA
- Email: johanna.boulant@chu-lyon.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lyon, France, 69004
- Recruiting
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Contact:
- Eugenie Mabrut, CRA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients having implant infection due to S. aureus treated by DAIR
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Deficiency of delta-hemolysine
Implant infected by Staphylococcus aureus with delta-haemolysin Production Deficiency
|
comparison of groups having infection with S. aureus with and without delta-haemolysin Production
|
|
Presence of delta-hemolysine
Implant infected by Staphylococcus aureus with delta-haemolysin Production
|
comparison of groups having infection with S. aureus with and without delta-haemolysin Production
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of infection with or witout delta-haemolysin in Staphylococcus Aureus
Time Frame: Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption
|
patients, profile of the bacterium, medical and chirurgical treatment, rate.
comparison between the 2 groups
|
Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption
|
Treatment failure is defined by local clinical and/or microbiological relapse; and/or need for additional surgery; death of septic origin.
Analyse of risk factor.
Comparison between the 2 groups
|
Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: FLORENT VALOUR, Md,PhD, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18-333
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.