Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers In Second Stage Implant Surgery
Clinical Comparison of The Use of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers In Second Stage Implant Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Van, Turkey, 65080
- Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- subject has osseointegrated implants embedded under oral mucosa.
- subject undergoes second-stage implant surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- inadequate keratinized gingiva in the implant site.
- localization of the implant site is not possible due to excessive thickness of the oral mucosa
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Diode laser
Soft tissue incision with 940 nm Gallium Aluminum Arsenide diode laser, at implant recovery settings (2.5 W output power, average power: 1.25 W, pulse length : 1.00 ms, pulse interval: 1.00 ms) in second-stage implant surgery.
|
Exposure of the cover screw of osseointegrated dental implants embedded under oral mucosa by performing the soft tissue incision with diode laser for placing the healing abutment.
|
|
Experimental: Erbium laser
Soft tissue incision with 2780 nm Er,Cr:YSGG laser, at implant recovery settings (2.00 W power, 100 Hz, H mode, 10% water and 10% air) in second-stage implant surgery.
|
Exposure of the cover screw of osseointegrated dental implants embedded under oral mucosa by performing the soft tissue incision with erbium laser for placing the healing abutment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative pain on 1st day
Time Frame: 1st Day
|
Patients score pain intensity with numeric scale ranging between 0(no pain) to 10(most severe pain) on the postoperative 1st day.
Pain scores on the postoperative 1st day in each group are compared.
|
1st Day
|
|
Postoperative pain on 2nd day
Time Frame: 2nd Day
|
Patients score pain intensity with numeric scale ranging between 0(no pain) to 10(most severe pain) on the postoperative 2nd day.
Pain scores on the postoperative 2nd day in each group are compared.
|
2nd Day
|
|
Postoperative pain on 3rd day
Time Frame: 3rd Day
|
Patients score pain intensity with numeric scale ranging between 0(no pain) to 10(most severe pain) on the postoperative 3rd day.
Pain scores on the postoperative 3rd day in each group are compared.
|
3rd Day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of analgesics used daily
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Analgesic consumption per day on postoperative 1st, 2nd and 3rd days.
|
3 days
|
|
Intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: During operation
|
Bleeding during surgical procedure was scored by the physician as 1=minimal, 2=normal and 3=excessive bleeding
|
During operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Erkan Feslihan, DDS, Van Yuzuncu Yil University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- El-Kholey KE. Efficacy and safety of a diode laser in second-stage implant surgery: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
- Arnabat-Dominguez J, Espana-Tost AJ, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Erbium:YAG laser application in the second phase of implant surgery: a pilot study in 20 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):104-12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24112017-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.