Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag Plus Pulsed Dexamethasone for Subjects With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

February 26, 2024 updated by: Humanity & Health Medical Group Limited

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag Plus Pulsed Dexamethasone as First Line Therapy for Subjects With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

Current first line treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) usually have transient effects and prolonged platelet response rate off therapy remains low. The aim is to evaluate whether a 12-week course of eltrombopag plus pulsed dexamethasone as first line therapy can increase the proportion of patients with prolonged response. Diagnosis of ITP is established according to the American Society of Hematology guidelines. Eligible ITP subjects have platelet counts <30×109/L or counts <50×109/L and significant bleeding symptoms (WHO bleeding scale 2 or above). Subjects must have no prior ITP treatment except platelet transfusions. Treatment consists of eltrombopag 25-75 mg daily according to platelet response for 12 weeks plus pulsed dexamethasone, 40 mg daily for 4 consecutive days every 4 weeks for 1-3 courses. The primary endpoint is prolonged response rate which was defined as the proportion of enrolled subjects maintaining platelet counts >50×109/L for more than 6 months without any ITP therapy after completion of 12-week therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
    • Hong Kong SAR
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong
        • Humanity & Health Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent.
  2. Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) Guidelines. In addition, the peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should be normal or at least not show signs suggestive of any disease likely to be associated with thrombocytopenia.
  3. No prior ITP treatment except platelet transfusions
  4. Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including evidence of any thrombosis.
  5. Normal prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), no history of hypercoagulable state.

  6. The following clinical chemistries must be within the normal reference range:

    creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, total albumin and alkaline phosphatase.

  7. Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart).
  8. Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis.
  2. History of active malignancy or on cancer therapy. Patients with a history of malignancy in complete remission for longer than 5 years are eligible
  3. History of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism).
  4. ≥ two of the following risk factors: Factor V Leiden, hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception containing estrogen, smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medications for hypertension or cancer.
  5. Pre-existing cardiac disease (including congestive heart failure, and arrhythmia requiring treatment), or clinically significant findings on resting 12-lead ECG at screening.
  6. Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
  7. History of alcohol/drug abuse.
  8. Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single Arm
Eltrombopag Oral Tablet 25-75 mg daily for 12 weeks plus pulsed dexamethasone
Drug: Eltrombopag
Eltrombopag Oral Tablet 25-75 mg daily for 12 weeks plus pulsed dexamethasone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The prolonged response rate
Time Frame: 6 months after completion of therapy
Defined as proportion of patients with platelet counts > 50,000/μl at 6 months after completion of therapy and free of ITP rescue therapy
6 months after completion of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to relapse
Time Frame: 6 months after completion of therapy
Defined as the interval from completion of 3 months treatment to platelet count<30,000/ul and restarting of ITP therapy including but not limited to platelet transfusion, IVIG, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, rituximab
6 months after completion of therapy
Early response rate
Time Frame: 6 months after completion of therapy
Defined as proportion of patients requiring less than 3 courses of pulsed dexamethasone to maintain platelet counts > 150,000/ul
6 months after completion of therapy
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months after completion of therapy
Assessed by SV36 HRQoL questionnaires
6 months after completion of therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Humanity & Health Medical Group Limited

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gregory Cheng, PhD, MD, Humanity & Health Research Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HHRC_ITP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings