rTMS to Improve Cognition in Parkinson's (TMSCogReP)

April 20, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

rTMS as a Cognitive Rehabilitation Approach in Veterans With Parkinson's Disease

The purpose of this study is to examine safety, feasibility, and the behavioral and brain effects of a non-invasive treatment, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), for Veterans with Parkinson's disease or atypical parkinsonism and mild impairments in their thinking. The hypothesis is that rTMS can improve thinking for people with Parkinson's disease or atypical parkinsonism who are experiencing mild problems with their thinking ability.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) shows promise as an effective cognitive neurorehabilitation treatment. To date, no rTMS studies have assessed the effect of rTMS on cognitive function in PD-MCI. Nor has there been PD neurophysiological studies using rTMS to examine neural plasticity in cognitive neural networks. This study seeks to fill this gap by conducting a small scaled pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to assess the safety and therapeutic effects of rTMS on cognitive outcomes as well as on brain connectivity in Veterans with PD-MCI. PD-MCI participants will be randomized to either active rTMS or sham rTMS. Participants will complete a standardized neurocognitive battery assessment at baseline, endpoint and at a one month follow-up. The primary outcome is change in executive function. Secondary outcomes include performance on other cognitive domain tasks and a proximal measure of real-life function that captures relevant functional changes related to cognitive impairment in PD. Multi-modal neuroimaging, in a subsample of participants, will be used to study neural connectivity changes induced by rTMS. Changes in resting state functional connectivity, grey matter volume via voxel-based morphometry and white matter integrity via diffusion tensor imaging will be assessed at baseline and endpoint. To inform how to optimize rTMS treatment in PD-MCI, these changes will be correlated with changes in cognitive performance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
56

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-3030
        • Recruiting
        • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandra L. Kletzel, PhD BA
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans who seek services at Hines VA Hospital or Jesse Brown VA Medical Center
  • Diagnosis of PD or atypical parkinsonism as determined by a neurologist
  • Meet criteria for having mild cognitive impairment
  • Receiving stable (i.e., no changes in medication and medication dose) medication and who are expected to remain on stable medication for the duration of the RCT
  • Speak and read English
  • 50 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Failure to demonstrate decision making capacity
  • History of deep brain stimulation surgery
  • Severe depression
  • Resting head tremor
  • Dyskinesia that will interfere with collecting imaging data
  • Has congestive heart failure
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Cochlear implant, nerve stimulator, or intracranial metal clips
  • Implanted medical pump
  • Increased intracranial pressure
  • History of claustrophobia
  • Metal in eyes/face, shrapnel/bullet remnants in brain

  • Participants at potential increased risk of seizure including those who have the following:

    • history (or family history) of seizure or epilepsy
    • history of stroke, head injury, or unexplained seizures

    • presence of other neurological disease that may be associated with an altered seizure threshold

      • such as CVA, cerebral aneurysm, dementia, increased intracranial pressure
  • Concurrent medication use such as tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptic medications, any other drug known to lower seizure threshold
  • Secondary conditions that may significantly alter electrolyte balance or lower seizure threshold
  • No quantifiable motor threshold such that rTMS dosage cannot be accurately deter-mined

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: active rTMS
For active rTMS, a butterfly coil and MagVenture MagProX100 stimulator (MagVenture, Falun, Denmark) will be used. One rTMS session will consist of 40 trains of 5sec each at 110% of resting motor threshold and 15Hz will be provided at the left DLPFC.
Device: MagVenture MagProX100 stimulator (MagVenture, Falun, Denmark)
The coil will be held tangentially to the skull at approximately 45º from the midline. One rTMS session will consist of 40 trains of 5sec each at 110% of resting motor threshold and 15Hz will be provided at the left DLPFC.
Device: MagVenture MagProX100 stimulator (MagVenture, Falun, Denmark)
The coil will be held tangentially to the skull at approximately 45º from the midline. The sham coil will not release any stimulation, but it will look, feel and sound like the real rTMS
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS
For sham rTMS, the procedure will be carried out at the left DLPFC but a sham coil will be used. The MagVenture coil has an active side and a placebo side allowing a double-blind study to be conducted. The sham system looks, sounds and feels like active rTMS.
Device: MagVenture MagProX100 stimulator (MagVenture, Falun, Denmark)
The coil will be held tangentially to the skull at approximately 45º from the midline. One rTMS session will consist of 40 trains of 5sec each at 110% of resting motor threshold and 15Hz will be provided at the left DLPFC.
Device: MagVenture MagProX100 stimulator (MagVenture, Falun, Denmark)
The coil will be held tangentially to the skull at approximately 45º from the midline. The sham coil will not release any stimulation, but it will look, feel and sound like the real rTMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in NIH sponsored Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for neurobehavioral evaluation and re-search (NIH-EXAMINER) executive composite score
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
The NIH-EXAMINER has an established 3-factor model defined by (1) cognitive control, (2) working memory (3) fluency. A confirmatory factor analysis indicates these 3-factors load on to 1-factor: executive composite score. Seven tests in the NIH-EXAMINER will be used to compute the composite score
baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sandra L. Kletzel, PhD BA, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N2938-W
  • IK2RX002938 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2023CWR-NDS-831171250 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Cures Within Reach)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Raw and/or normalized data will be made available in the form of Excel files. MRI images will anonymized and made available through the Northwestern University Neuroimaging Data Archive (NUNDA).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Final data sets will be made available as per Hines VA Hospital local policy for long term storage and access until enterprise-level resources become available.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

These data will be available upon request by researchers and scientists in accordance with federal guidelines and Hines local policy.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings