(R33 Phase) DELISH Study: Diabetes Education to Lower Insulin, Sugars, and Hunger (DELISH R33)
Optimizing Lifestyle Interventions With Mindfulness-based Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators will randomize 120 persons with T2DM in a 1:1 ratio to a nutrition education alone arm (Ed n=60) vs. a nutrition education with mindfulness-based intervention components (Ed+MBI n=60) arm and follow them for 12 months. The interventions will be provided in a weekly group setting, with about 10 to 12 persons per group. Some educational intervention components will be delivered using a smartphone app. After the 12-week initial intervention, the investigators will re-randomize participants using an adaptive intervention design to receive low, medium, or high intensity maintenance training, depending on level of adherence achieved during the initial intervention period. Follow-up assessments will be performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The investigators will address the following specific aims:
- Test the hypothesis that the Ed+MBI arm will have better dietary adherence than the Ed arm.
- Test whether our proposed behavioral mechanisms (e.g. decreased eating in response to cravings or difficult emotions) predict dietary adherence.
- Obtain preliminary assessment of intervention effects on clinical outcomes
This is the second phase of a two-phase study. Pilot testing has been completed in the first phase (R61). The focus of the second phase (R33) is on comparing dietary adherence between the Ed only and ED + MBI arms over a 12-month period. This phase will also include employing an adaptive intervention design in the post-treatment phase to test optimization of the maintenance intervention (i.e. assigning maintenance intensity/dose based on how a participant is doing). The maintenance phase intensities will be assessed to provide preliminary data for planning future trials. The primary analysis focus of this phase will be on the comparing the groups formed by the initial randomization to Ed versus Ed + MBI. The investigators will use fingerstick blood ketone measures, which provide an objective measure of whether the target levels of carbohydrate restriction have been attained, as our primary adherence outcome measure. This will be supplemented by 24-hour diet recall measures of carbohydrate consumption. Important secondary outcome measures will include clinical measures such as glycosylated hemoglobin and behavioral measures such as frequency of eating in response to food cravings.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of T2DM mellitus.
- HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and < 12.0% at screening.
- Experience food-related cravings most days of the week and eat in response to these cravings regularly.
- Aged 18 years old and older.
- Able to engage in light physical activity.
- Willing and able to participate in the interventions including appropriate participation in the group setting.
- Have smartphone and are willing to use it on a regular basis for data collection.
- Ability to speak English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- A substance abuse, mental health, or medical condition that, in the opinion of investigators, will make it difficult for the potential participant to participate in the intervention, that may need immediate changes in medical management that will affect study outcome measures, or that may require important adaptations in the study diet.
- Pregnant or planning to get pregnant in the next 12 months, breastfeeding or less than 6 months post-partum.
- Current use of weight loss medications, such as Alli or amphetamine-based drugs that may affect weight.
- Planned or history of weight-loss (bariatric) surgery, or other intestinal surgeries that cause malabsorption. These are likely to change study outcome measures, making it difficult to distinguish the effects of the intervention program, or require extensive tailoring of the diet intervention.
- Currently enrolled in a weight loss program, such as Weight Watchers or a self-help group such as Overeaters Anonymous, or have unalterable plans to enroll in one of these programs in the next year; using a ketogenic low carbohydrate diet in the past 6 months with advice from a health care professional; or use of a mindful eating program with guidance from a professional in the past 6 months or have ever used the study mindful-eating app.
- Vegan or vegetarian.
- Unwilling to do regular blood testing at home for glucose or ketone monitoring.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Diet Education
All participants will receive instruction in the Carbohydrate-Restricted (CR) diet and basic behavioral strategies in weekly, in-person, group sessions for 3 months.
The study diet has approximately 10% of kcal coming from carbohydrate, typically 50 grams/day or fewer, not including fiber.
Participants will be encouraged to eat a normal amount of protein, typically about 80-100 grams/day (about 20-25% of calories), and the rest of their calories from fat.
|
Education for carbohydrate-restricted diet
|
|
Experimental: Diet Education + Mindfulness
In addition to the diet components described above, participants randomized to the Education + Mindfulness (Ed+MBI) group will receive MBI components using the Eat Right Now (ERN) platform.
This will consist of two integrated components: 1) use of the ERN app at home, during the week, to learn and practice mindfulness skills for food-cravings and eating, and 2) in-person group-based discussions of how the mindful eating practices are going, trouble-shooting obstacles/pain points, and doing group exercises and reflecting on them.
|
Education for carbohydrate-restricted diet
Mindful eating app use plus group sessions to learn mindfulness
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by % of Ketones >= 0.5 mmol/L
Time Frame: Measures from ketone measure initiation (week 5) to 12 months. Ketones were measured daily over 7 days at 5 study timepoints: 5 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
|
Percent of participant ketone measures > or = 0.5 mmol/L during trial, by study arm
|
Measures from ketone measure initiation (week 5) to 12 months. Ketones were measured daily over 7 days at 5 study timepoints: 5 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
|
|
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by % of Participants in Each Arm With < 50 Grams/Day of Non-fiber Carbohydrate on 24- Hour Diet Recall
Time Frame: Average of three measures, done at 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Average percent of participant measures with consumption of < 50 grams/day of non-fiber carbohydrate (from 24-hour diet recall) by arm.
Each participant was assigned a % of up to three measures reporting < 50 grams/day of non-fiber carbohydrate consumption, and this percent was averaged across each arm.
|
Average of three measures, done at 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Emotion-related Eating
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
change in emotion-related eating as measured by the Coping subscale of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale (PEMS).
The coping subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (based on a mean of 4 items), with higher values indicating more emotion-related eating (the intervention aimed to lower this score--lower scores represent improvement).
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Glycemic Control--HbA1c
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 12 months with study arm
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Frequency of Eating in Response to Cravings
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
|
Frequency of eating in response to cravings (indulgence) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), operationalized as the percent of solicited occasions when a participant reported eating in response to cravings (rather than in response merely to hunger).
Participants received 18 queries about eating in response to cravings over 3 days.
Participants had to respond to at least 9 queries to have adequate data completeness for analysis.
Frequency of eating in response to cravings is the proportion (scaled as a percent) of queries that participants responded to with responses that reported eating in response to cravings.
|
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by Mean Grams of Non-fiber Carbohydrate Consumed Per Day From 24- Hour Diet Recall
Time Frame: From 3 to 12 months, using measures done at 3, 6, and 12 months
|
Mean grams of non-fiber carbohydrate consumed per day (from 24-hour diet recall) during trial.
We calculated average grams of non-fiber consumed per day across up to three measures during the trial for each participant, and this was averaged across arms.
|
From 3 to 12 months, using measures done at 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Salzburg Stress Eating Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Change in stress-related eating as measured by Salzburg Stress Eating Scale.
Range is from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater stress-related eating.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Weight Change
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 month weight data
|
Body mass in kilograms (kg) from baseline to 12 months
|
change from baseline to 12 month weight data
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress-related Eating
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Change in stress-related eating as measured by two questions about stress-related eating from the MIDUS study and one additional stress-related eating question.
Range is 2 to 8. Higher scores indicate more stress-related eating.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale total score.
Range is 0 to 40.
Higher scores indicate more perceived stress.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
HOMA-2IR Index of Insulin Resistance
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Insulin resistance estimated from the Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) model 2 index of insulin resistance.
The basic formula is: (glucose × insulin) / 22.5, where glucose is measured in mmol/L and insulin in mU/L.
The computer assisted re-calibration in model 2 addresses variations in the glucose resistance of the peripheral tissue and liver, increases in the insulin secretion curve for glucose > 180 mg/dL, and contribution of circulating pro-insulin.
Higher values indicate more insulin resistance (worse outcome).
The Oxford University HOMA-2IR calculator was used (https://process.innovation.ox.ac.uk/software/p/2112/homa2-calculator/1).
HOMA index values < 2.0 are generally considered normal and indicate adequate sensitivity of cells to insulin.
HOMA index values between 2.0 and 2.5 may indicate borderline changes in insulin sensitivity.
HOMA index values > 2.5 clearly indicate insulin resistance.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Fasting Glucose
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Glycemic control as measured by fasting blood glucose
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Mindfulness: FFMQ
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Five-factor mindfulness questionnaire scale (FFMQ).
Values represent an overall score summing five sub-scales.
Range is 24 to 120.
Higher scores indicate greater mindfulness.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rick Hecht, MD, University of California, San Francisco
- Principal Investigator: Elissa Epel, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Metabolic Diseases
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Therapeutics
- Diet, Food, and Nutrition
- Physiological Phenomena
- Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
- Diet Therapy
- Nutrition Therapy
- Diet
- Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4R33AT009333 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.