DELPhI Evaluation of Psychiatric Conditions

February 15, 2022 updated by: QuantalX Neuroscience

Cross-sectional Evaluation of Psychiatric Population With DELPhI- Characterization of Psychiatric Conditions

DELPhI acquisition and analysis software, a QuantalX Neuroscience development, which is designed to measure, analyze, and display brain electrical activity of human electroencephalogram (EEG), to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), will be used to evaluate different psychiatric conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Psychiatric conditions requiring pharmaceutical treatment include Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, Major depressive disorder, Bi-polar disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and anxiety disorders. To date none of the psychiatric conditions mentioned diagnosis' relies on an imaging or other quantitative technique. Diagnosis and treatment prescription in the psychiatric clinic still relies on subjective reports and physician assessment of symptoms. Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation method that allows to study human cortical function In-vivo. Using TMS for examining human cortical functionality is enhanced by combining TMS with simultaneous registration of electroencephalograph (EEG). EEG provides an opportunity to directly measure the cerebral response to TMS, measuring the cortical TMS Evoked potential (TEP), is used to assess cerebral reactivity across wide areas of neo-cortex. Studies integrating TMS with EEG (TMS-EEG) have shown that TMS produces waves of activity that reverberate throughout the cortex. and that are reproducible and reliable thus providing direct information about cortical excitability and connectivity with excellent time resolution. By evaluating the propagation of evoked activity in different behavioral states and in different tasks, TMS-EEG has been used to causally probe the dynamic effective connectivity of human brain networks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

study group: patients diagnosed with either Major depression, Bi-polar disorder, OCD, PTSD, ADHD or Schizophrenia,.without any psychiatric medications or with stable treatment regimen for the last 2 months.

Control group:

Eligible consecutive healthy individuals, recruited through advertisements spread in campuses and clinics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult male and female patients between the age of 18-80 years old.
  2. Patients willing to participate with all of the study procedures and sign informed consent form.
  3. A clinical diagnosis of psychiatric condition that requires medication or other intervention (such as brain stimulation or psychological treatment).-study groups.
  4. Without any psychiatric medications or with stable treatment regimen for the last 2 months-study groups..

4.5. A normal neurological exam- control group.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Prior known epileptic episode. 2. History of any neurodegenerative disease. 3. Patients with history of other known brain disorder/pathology. 4. Contraindication to MR imaging.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Psychiatric patients
Major depression, Bi-polar, schizophrenia, ADHD, OCD, PTSD
healthy controls
young healthy controls to serve as norm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison of DELPhI parameter of Plasticity in psychiatric population to healthy norms.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of DELPhI parameters of Plasticity in patients, in comparison to healthy norms. Parameters will be analyzed for their temporal and special components.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
comparison of DELPhI parameter of Connectivity in psychiatric population to healthy norms.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of DELPhI parameters of Connectivity in patients, in comparison to healthy norms. Parameters will be analyzed for their temporal and special components.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between DELPhI parameters and symptom severity.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Self-control analysis of the change in DELPhI parameters following change in treatment prescription or any other treatment at different time points compared to base-line. Correlation to symptom severity will be assessed.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cluster analysis of Plasticity and connectivity in relation to medical treatment and clinical diagnosis.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Cluster subjects by each plasticity and connectivity vs. medical treatment and clinical diagnosis.
through study completion, an average of 1 year.
characterization of the change in Plasticity following change of treatment regimen
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
characterization of the change in Plasticity of Plasticity following change of treatment regimen.
through study completion, an average of 1 year.
characterization of the change in Connectivity following change of treatment regimen
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
characterization of the change in Connectivity following change of treatment regimen.
through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
QuantalX Neuroscience

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 605

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings