Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access (CEPHAX) (CEPHAX)
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access. The CEPHAX Study.
This clinical trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of axillary versus cephalic venous access in the pacemakers and defibrillators implantation.
Half of participants will receive the implant via fluoroscopy guided axillary venous access and the other half will receive the implant via improved cephalic venous access.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ciudad Real, Spain, 13005
- Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a endovenous pacemaker or defibrillator indication.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing ipsilateral pacing electrode.
- Previous ipsilateral lymphadenectomy.
- Indication of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AXILLARY VEIN ACCESS
This group of subjects will receive the implant of device via fluoroscopy-guided axillary puncture technique.
|
Implantation of endovenous cardiac stimulation device.
Implantation of endovenous cardiac defibrillation device.
Fluoroscopy-guided axillary puncture to get vein access
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CEPHALIC VEIN ACCESS
This group of subjects will receive the implant of device via optimized cephalic vein cutdown technique.
|
Implantation of endovenous cardiac stimulation device.
Implantation of endovenous cardiac defibrillation device.
Optimized cephalic vein cutdown to get vein access
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Success
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Success of the implant through the assigned access vein
|
30 days
|
|
Implant Complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
All implant related complications
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lead Complications
Time Frame: From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
|
Lead fracture or dysfunction
|
From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
|
|
Upper limb thrombosis
Time Frame: From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
|
Thrombosis of the ipsilateral upper limb
|
From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
|
|
Pneumothorax
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Implant related pneumothorax
|
30 days
|
|
Bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Implant related bleeding
|
30 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to access.
Time Frame: From cutaneous incision to reach the right atrium with the guidewire, assessed up to 45 minutes.
|
Time until reaching venous access.
|
From cutaneous incision to reach the right atrium with the guidewire, assessed up to 45 minutes.
|
|
Time of implant.
Time Frame: From the skin incision to the skin suture, assessed up to 180 minutes.
|
Intervention time.
|
From the skin incision to the skin suture, assessed up to 180 minutes.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Javier Jiménez Díaz, Dr., Arrhythmia Unit Director
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Calkins H, Ramza BM, Brinker J, Atiga W, Donahue K, Nsah E, Taylor E, Halperin H, Lawrence JH, Tomaselli G, Berger RD. Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Apr;24(4 Pt 1):456-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00456.x.
- Squara F, Tomi J, Scarlatti D, Theodore G, Moceri P, Ferrari E. Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access. Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):2001-2006. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw363.
- Jimenez-Diaz J, Higuera-Sobrino F, Piqueras-Flores J, Perez-Diaz P, Gonzalez-Marin MA. Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1588-1593. doi: 10.1111/jce.14060. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-276
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.