Tradeoff Between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Tradeoff Between Spatial Resolution of Neural Excitation and Temporal Rate Processing
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, ECU
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Native speakers of English
- Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implant users or Advanced Bionics users
- Postlingually deafened
- Has had device experience for at least one year
- Can be child or adult at the time of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Cochlear implant users with Nucleus and AB devices
Temporal processing acuity will be compared using electrodes or electrode configurations that create broad versus sharp spatial excitation. Speech recognition will be compared in the same group of subjects using electrode-dependent focused versus monopolar stimulation. |
Electrodes will be chosen based on their spatial tuning curves.
Focused stimulation will be applied to electrodes with good temporal processing acuity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity to stimulation rate change at threshold
Time Frame: starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
Subjects' psychophysical detection thresholds will be measured as a function of the rate of stimulation delivered to selected electrodes and selected electrode configuration
|
starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
|
Discrimination of stimulation rate
Time Frame: starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
subjects' ability to discriminate stimulation rates will be measured as a function of base stimulation rates at selected electrodes and selected electrode configuration.
|
starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech recognition
Time Frame: starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
Speech recognition in quiet and in noise will be measured under three conditions: 1. the traditional monopolar electrode configuration; 2. using current focusing on electrodes that show good sensitivity to rate change; 3. using current focusing on all electrodes.
|
starting 6 months post award notice and will take up to 4 years to complete
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99. doi: 10.1121/1.408469.
- Bierer JA, Litvak L. Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation. Trends Hear. 2016 Jun 17;20:2331216516653389. doi: 10.1177/2331216516653389.
- Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Mar;7(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2. Epub 2005 Nov 4.
- Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS. Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3916-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3583503.
- Berenstein CK, Mens LH, Mulder JJ, Vanpoucke FJ. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):250-60. doi: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181645336.
- Boulet J, White M, Bruce IC. Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Feb;17(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0545-5.
- Carlyon RP, Deeks JM. Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):2885-905. doi: 10.1121/1.4934275.
- Carlyon RP, Deeks JM. Limitations on rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1009-25. doi: 10.1121/1.1496766.
- Dingemanse JG, Frijns JH, Briaire JJ. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):645-57. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000246683.29611.1b.
- Eggermont JJ. Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: a model oriented review. Hear Res. 1985 Apr;18(1):57-71. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90110-8.
- Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;6(3):269-79. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6.
- Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):221-30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318230fff8.
- Goldsworthy RL, Shannon RV. Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):334-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4835735.
- Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res. 2000 Feb;140(1-2):45-76. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00186-0.
- Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ, Nelson DA. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):656-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3282947.
- Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. doi: 10.1121/1.2184128.
- Landsberger DM. Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):EL21-7. doi: 10.1121/1.2947624.
- Macherey O, Carlyon RP. Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):3186. doi: 10.1121/1.4900917.
- McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1622-31. doi: 10.1121/1.418177.
- McKay CM, McDermott HJ. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1061-74. doi: 10.1121/1.423316.
- Miller CA, Woo J, Abbas PJ, Hu N, Robinson BK. Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Apr;12(2):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0249-9. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
- Moore BC. Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Sep;54(3):610-9. doi: 10.1121/1.1913640. No abstract available.
- Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):886-95. doi: 10.1121/1.413514.
- Thornton AR, Raffin MJ. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):507-18. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Zhou_R01_study1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.