Long-term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient Undergoing CABG or PCI

April 10, 2023 updated by: Young Bin Song, Samsung Medical Center

Registry for Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stent

  1. To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
  2. To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains one of the world's leading causes of death, despite markedly improvement of devices and technologies on past several decades. The treatment strategy for CAD included medical treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG is a procedure in which autologous arteries or veins are used as grafts to bypass coronary arteries that are partially or completely obstructed by atherosclerotic plaque. During the past decade, there has been nearly a 30% decline in CABG procedures, despite abundant evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of the operation.This decline has been accompanied by a corresponding increase in PCI. To date, there have been numerous studies to compare the clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG for patients with CAD. Among them, SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial demonstrated CABG is associated with lower incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascualr events in patients with high SYNTAX score, compared with PCI. In this regard, the current guidelines recommend that CABG is preferred method for care of stable ischemic heart disease patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. However, most randomized controlled studies do not reflect the contemporary practice, because they have been performed in the era of bare metal stents or first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). In addition, there have been limited data regarding the prognostic factors for long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with DES or CABG. Therefore, the investigators sought to compare the clinical outcomes between PCI with DES or CABG, and to identify prognostic factors for long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PCI with DES or CABG.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

About 10,000 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease and who underwent PCI with DES or CABG.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who suspected ischemic heart disease and underwent CABG or PCI with DES

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CABG
Patients with CAD who undergoing CABG
Procedure: CABG
Patients who undergoing CABG
PCI
Patients with CAD who undergoing PCI with DES
Procedure: PCI
Patients who undergoing PCI with DES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac Death
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
death from cardiac-cause
5-Year after the index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause Death
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
death from any-cause
5-Year after the index procedure
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
Myocardial infarction without peri-procedural myocardial infarction
5-Year after the index procedure
Target-vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
ischemia-driven or all
5-Year after the index procedure
Any revascularization
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
ischemia-driven or all
5-Year after the index procedure
Bleeding
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
BARC type 2-5
5-Year after the index procedure
Cerebrovascular accident
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
Ischemic or hemorrhagic
5-Year after the index procedure
MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular accident)
Time Frame: 5-Year after the index procedure
a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident
5-Year after the index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Samsung Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Young Bin Song, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CABG2019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings