Nitinol Circular Blade (NCB)

March 18, 2019 updated by: Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

Transaortic Native Valve Resection Using a Novel Nitinol Blade Device Rather Than a Classical Surgical Blade (Nitinol Circular Blade)

The Nitinol Circular Blade (NCB) is indicated for use in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement, who are going to be operated by conventional sternotomy with native valve resection and replacement by a prosthetic aortic valve. The resection of the diseased leaflets will be performed by the NCB rather than conventional surgical blade.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The patient will be under general anesthesia. The sternum will be opened fully or partially. The patient will be prepared for cardiopulmonary bypass. A transversal aortotomy will be performed as usual. The aortic valve will be exposed for the resection. The NCB will be inserted under visual control from the aorta to the left ventricle. The collection chamber will be closed and the circular blade can be advanced forward to resect the diseased native aortic valve. Once the resection is completed the device will be retrieved carefully. Complementary fine cleaning of the aortic annulus can be done by the surgeon in order to prepare the annulus to receive the prosthetic valve. After implantation of the new valve classically the aortotomy will be closed. Standard weaning of cardiopulmonary bypass will be done and the operation will be safely completed. The aim of this blade is to evaluate the resection time, test the efficiency of a circular Nitinol blade during resection of the calcified native aortic leaflets. A careful examination of the resection edges, aortic annulus, mitral valve and all surrounding tissues will be done in order to validate the efficacy of this Nitinol Circular Blade.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Recruiting
        • Parla ASTARCI
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Parla ASTARCI, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe aortic stenosis defined as one or more of the following by Doppler echocardiography: mean gradient >40 mmHg; max velocity >4 m/sec; aortic valve area <=0.8 cm2.
  • Symptoms related to aortic valve disease, and NYHA Functional Class II or greater
  • Subject is indicated for aortic valve implantation with a biological prosthesis (tissue valve)
  • Age >= 65 years
  • Echocardiographically determined aortic annulus diameter >=24 mm and <=30 mm in a long-axis view
  • Subject understands the implications of participating in the study and provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital unicuspid aortic valve
  • Severe eccentricity of calcification, defined as calcium deposits larger than 6 mm in diameter
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <25% as determined by contrast ventriculography, or echocardiography or radionuclide angiography if contrast ventriculography not available
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Subjects with life expectancy less than 12 months due to an underlying non-cardiac co-morbid disease
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication that cannot be adequately controlled with pre-medication to any study medication or material, such as contrast medium or Nitinol
  • Blood dyscrasia such as acute anemia, leucopenia, or thrombocytopenia; bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy
  • Renal insufficiency assessed by creatinine >2.5 mg/dl and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
  • Poor lung function that in the investigator's opinion is prohibitive for thoracotomy
  • Active peptic ulcer or GI bleeding within 3 months from the planned index procedure
  • Cardiogenic shock, suspected cardiogenic shock, or hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance
  • Peripheral vascular disease, including abdominal and thoracic aortic disease, that could pose a problem for eventual transarterial mechanical support (e.g. intraaortic balloon pump)
  • History of myocardial infarction in the last 6 weeks
  • History of TIA or CVA in the last 6 months
  • Subject refuses to have a blood transfusion
  • Subject is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial that may influence the outcome of this trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Resection of the aortic valve leaflets with device
Patients in which the aortic valve has been resected using the nitinol blade
Device: Aortic valve replacement using a nitinol blade
A circular nitinol blade will be inserted by to cut the aortic valve leaflets during conventional aortic valve replacement procedure
Other: Resection of the aortic valve leaflets in standard fashion
Patients in which the aortic valve has been resected using a conventional blade or scissor
Procedure: aortic valve replacement
Aortic valve replacement in a standard fashion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural success of the resection
Time Frame: Hospital discharge : in average 1 week
Resection of the aortic valve leaflets by the circular nitinol blade
Hospital discharge : in average 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication due to the use of the device
Time Frame: 1 year
Any complication related to the use of the nitinol blade
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Parla ASTARCI, Md PhD, Cliniques universiatires St Luc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014/14OCT/513

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings