Efficacy of a Transcranial Vibrating System for Mitigation of Migraine Associated Vertigo

April 23, 2021 updated by: Otolith Labs

Efficacy of a Transcranial Vibrating System for Mitigation of Outcomes of Migraine Associated Vertigo

Vertigo is among the most common symptoms associated with migraine and affects 26.5% of migraine sufferers, leading to a dramatic impact in life limiting even the most simple activities. A new device, the OtoBand, a transcranial vibrating system, has been shown to mitigate and sometimes prevent vertigo and nausea in healthy subjects. The current study aims to determine if the Otoband can treat or reduce symptoms of Migraine Associated Vertigo (MAV).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vertigo is among the most common symptoms associated with migraine and affects 26.5% of migraine sufferers. Migraine Associated Vertigo (MAV) has a dramatic impact on daily life, impacting work, relationships, and even activities of daily living. At the current time, the mainstay of therapy for migraine is pharmaceutical intervention, either acute (particularly triptans, 2) or preventative. However, this therapy has a delayed effect and can lead to a host of side effects.

In this project we examine a device that has shown promise and might be beneficial for treating or improving the course of recovery from MAV. The Otoband is a transcranial vibrating system to be placed against the skull, preferably over the mastoid bone, behind the ear. To date, the device has only been systematically tested on healthy volunteers and has shown improvement of vertigo symptoms during the use of virtual reality systems and road motion sickness.

Individuals identified at Jefferson University medical center with a history of MAV attacks will be referred to the Otolaryngology Department where their diagnosis will be confirmed and offered to enroll in the study. Participants will be able to take home an Otoband to wear when they have MAV attacks. The Otoband will be set at the effective power (proved to reduce vertigo symptoms in previous studies) and low power (proved to not impact vertigo symptoms, considered as sham device). Participants will have to assay their vertigo symptoms before, during and immediately after wearing the Otoband to evaluate the efficacy of the device.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subject between the ages of 18-65 with a history of frequent Migraine Associated Vertigo (MAV) attacks as characterized by the following:

  • An episode with acute onset vertigo that lasted at least 15 minutes within the previous 30 days.
  • At least 5 such episodes in the past 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of head injury within the last six months or currently suffering the effects of a head injury
  2. Presence of severe aphasia
  3. History of diagnosed neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. hypochondriasis, major depression, schizophrenia)
  4. Documented neurodegenerative disorders
  5. Pregnancy [Female candidates will be asked if they are pregnant]

  6. Prior disorders of hearing and balance including:

    1. Ménière's disease
    2. Multiple sclerosis
    3. Vestibular neuritis
    4. Vestibular schwannoma
    5. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
  7. History of Cerebrovascular disorders
  8. History of ear operation other than myringotomy and tube placement in the past
  9. Planned major surgery of the skull base (for instance, cochlear implant)
  10. Systemic disorders to include chronic renal failure, cirrhosis of the liver, autoimmune disease, heart disease, lung disease, or severe arthritis
  11. Individuals who cannot provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Otoband efficacy on vertigo

Participants will be given the transcranial vibrating system (Otoband) to be used during migrane associated vertigo (MAV) attacks. Participants will be able to use the Otoband up to 4 times, 30 minutes each time, per day. The Otoband will be set to the effective power level. Participants will fill out questionnaires about 4 symptoms associated to MAV: before, during (2 and 20 minutes after turning on the Otoband) and after the session (20 minutes after the Otoband was or has stopped). The conditions evaluated will be: dizziness, nausea, headache and brain confusion.

Participants will complete questionnaires either online using secure HIPPA-compliant webforms, or using pre-printed questionnaires, as they prefer.
Device: Otoband
The Otoband will be used by participants during migraine associated vertigo (MAV). We expect the research subjects to use the device for at least 20 minutes, with the hardware limiting any one session to a duration of 30 minutes, up to 4 times per calendar day. The Otoband will be set to the effective power level during the course of a given calendar day.
Sham Comparator: Otoband sham efficacy on vertigo

Participants will be given the transcranial vibrating system (Otoband) to be used during migrane associated vertigo (MAV) attacks. Participants will be able to use the Otoband up to 4 times, 30 minutes each time, per day. The Otoband will be set to an ineffective power level, serving as a placebo. Participants will fill out questionnaires about 4 symptoms associated to MAV: before, during (2 and 20 minutes after turning on the Otoband) and after the session (20 minutes after the Otoband was or has stopped). The conditions evaluated will be: dizziness, nausea, headache and brain confusion.

Participants will complete questionnaires either online using secure HIPPA-compliant webforms, or using pre-printed questionnaires, as they prefer.
Device: Otoband sham
The Otoband will be used by participants during migraine associated vertigo (MAV) for a maximum of 30 minutes, up to 4 times per calendar day. The Otoband will be set to an ineffective power level (considered a sham device) during the course of a given calendar day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in vertigo symptoms
Time Frame: 2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Questionnaire for vertigo symptoms from 0 (none) to 10 (agonizing)
2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Brain confusion
Time Frame: 2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Questionnaire for brain confusion: scale from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum) for the 4 following symptoms: forgetful, difficulty thinking/finding words, difficulty focusing, cloudy.
2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in nausea symptoms
Time Frame: 2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Questionnaire for nausea symptoms from 0 (none) to 10 (agonizing)
2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Change in headache symptoms
Time Frame: 2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband
Questionnaire for nausea symptoms from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain possible)
2 minutes and 20 minutes after starting the Otoband; and 20 minutes after stopping the Otoband

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Otolith Labs

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dennis Fitzgerald, MD, Jefferson University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OLith10401

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings