Evaluation of Flortaucipir PET Signal and Cognitive Change in Early Alzheimer's Disease

August 21, 2020 updated by: Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Baseline Flortaucipir PET Signal and Cognitive Change in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease Participating in the I8D-MC-AZES Protocol Addendum D5010C00009 (2.1) (Tau Imaging)

This study will evaluate whether visual interpretation of flortaucipir-PET (positron emission tomography) scans, examining patterns of tracer uptake at baseline, can predict the rate of clinically-meaningful cognitive decline due to AD after 18 months. All scans are acquired from cohorts of a previously completed study, I8D-MC-AZES (NCT02245737, lanabecestat, Eli Lilly and Company sponsor).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • American College of Radiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Scan Reader Criteria (5 total readers):

  • Board-certified in radiology or nuclear medicine
  • Professional experience interpreting PET scans

Scan Criteria (205 total scans):

  • Former enrollment in AZES Study
  • Flortaucipir scan at baseline
  • clinical dementia rating - sum of boxes (CDR-SB) assessment at 18 months

Scan Study Population (AZES Study):

  • 55 to 85 years
  • MCI due to AD or probable AD by National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria (Albert 2011
  • mini-mental status exam (MMSE) of 20 to 30 inclusive
  • CDR global score of 0.5 (MCI), or 0.5 or 1 (AD) with a memory box score ≥ 0.5, and a score of ≤85 on the Delayed Memory Index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.
  • Amyloid positive status confirmed by florbetapir PET or lumbar puncture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Flortaucipir PET Scan
No study drug will be administered. Scans previously acquired from Study I8D-MC-AZES (NCT02245737, Eli Lilly and Company sponsor) will be read by independent, blinded readers.
Drug: flortaucipir F18
No study drug will be administered. Scans previously acquired from Study I8D-MC-AZES (NCT02245737, Eli Lilly and Company sponsor) at baseline will be read by independent, blinded readers. IV injection, 240 megabecquerel (MBq) (6.5 mCi), single dose in AZES
Other Names:
  • 18F-AV-1451
  • [F-18]T807
  • LY3191748
Procedure: Brain PET Scan
positron emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk Ratio for AD Symptom Progression on CDR-SB
Time Frame: Within 18 months of scan
Baseline flortaucipir F 18 PET imaging results were determined by majority read (see Baseline Characteristics for description). Clinically meaningful deterioration (CMD) was defined for the primary endpoint as a worsening of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score of one point or more. The clinical dementia rating (CDR) examines 6 categories of cognitive functioning domains. Each domain is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (including 0.5). A CDR-SB was generated as the sum of the values in each of the 6 domains. The CDR-SB sum scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and a 1 point worsening is considered a clinically significant symptom change.
Within 18 months of scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk Ratio for AD Symptom Progression on Various Clinical Measures
Time Frame: Within 18 months of scan
Baseline flortaucipir F 18 PET imaging results were determined by majority read (see Baseline Characteristics for description). Clinically meaningful deterioration (CMD) was defined for the cognitive endpoints as follows: mini-mental status exam (MMSE) worsening of 3 points or greater, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog11) worsening of 4 points or greater, Pfeffer's Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) worsening of 3 points or greater, CDR global worsening of greater than 0 points. MMSE scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating worsening cognitive function. ADAS-Cog11 scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive function. FAQ scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive function. CDR global is scored on a 5 point scale (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3) with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive function.
Within 18 months of scan
Mean Change in Cognitive/Functional Assessments
Time Frame: baseline and 18 months
Mean change in cognitive/functional measures baseline between τAD++ and non-τAD++ (determined by baseline tau status), calculated by Mixed Model Repeat Measures (MMRM). CDR-SB scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive impairment. MMSE scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating worsening cognitive function. ADAS-Cog11 scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive function. FAQ scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating worsening cognitive function.
baseline and 18 months
Inter-Reader Reliability of Reader Interpretation of Flortaucipir F 18 PET Imaging
Time Frame: baseline scan
As measured by Fleiss' Kappa across all scans read. Fleiss' kappa is a statistical measure for assessing the reliability of agreement between a fixed number of raters when assigning categorical ratings to a number of items or classifying items. Fleiss' kappa can range from -1 to 1 with 1 indicating perfect agreement between the readers. Read results binarized as τAD++ or non-τAD++.
baseline scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18F-AV-1451-PX01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings