22G-ProCore vs 22G-Standard Needle in Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy by EBUS-TBNA

September 27, 2022 updated by: Jiayuan Sun

Comparion of 22G-ProCore and 22G-Standard Needle in Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy Via EBUS-TBNA: A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of 22G-ProCore and 22G-Standard needle in diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy via EBUS-TBNA with the purpose to explore the optimal technique for obtaining diagnostic material.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

EBUS-TBNA is an important minimally invasive tool for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. The investigators will explore the performance of two kinds of needles and different methods to obtain tissues via EBUS-TBNA in the study. The study is designed as a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, 600 patients will be expected to enroll in the study and randomly assigned to two groups, the 22G-ProCore group and the 22G-Standard group. The primary aim is to compare the diagnostic yields of the two types of needles. The secondary endpoint is to assess the quality of histologic specimen. Meanwhile, stylet slow-pull or negative suction techniques and different agitations (10, 20, 30 times) that each pass includes will be evaluated in the study as well.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jiayuan Sun, PhD
  • Phone Number: 1511 +86-021-22200000
  • Email: jysun1976@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Imaging examination indicates enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes need pathological diagnosis (any lymph node has a short diameter > 1 cm in CT or PET-CT SUV value > 2.5).
  2. Accessible mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy to EBUS-TBNA.
  3. Inform consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications of EBUS-TBNA. Such as use of anticoagulant therapy or presence of a coagulopathy (platelet count < 50000 or INR > 1.5).
  2. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other indications that can't tolerate bronchoscopy.
  3. Life expectancy less than 6 months.
  4. Uncooperative patients.
  5. Patients representing vulnerable populations (prisoners, pregnant women, etc).
  6. Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 22G-ProCore Group
The experimental group with 22G-ProCore needle is expected to enroll 300 patients. The 22G-ProCore needle has a 1.5mm long groove 2.5mm above the needle tip, which is expected to have the advantage of taking more biopsy tissues than the 22G-Standard needle.
Device: 22G-ProCore Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle
EchoTip Procore® Endobronchial HD Ultrasound Biopsy Needle, COOK
Active Comparator: 22G-Standard Group
The control group of 22G-Standard needle is expected to include 300 patients, and there is no groove above the needle tip compared with 22G-ProCore needle.
Device: 22G-Standard Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle
EchoTip® Ultra Endobronchial High Definition Ultrasound Needle, COOK

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of 22G-ProCore needle
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield is defined as percentage of specimens in which diagnostic material is obtained.
up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield of 22G-Standard needle
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield is defined as percentage of specimens in which diagnostic material is obtained.
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The quality of histologic specimen used by 22G-ProCore needle
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The number and ratio of cellularity, blood contamination, and core-tissue acquisition.
up to 6 months
The quality of histologic specimen used by 22G-Standard needle
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The number and ratio of cellularity, blood contamination, and core-tissue acquisition.
up to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of aspiration techniques
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Conventional EBUS-TBNA procedures involve use of 10mL negative suction aspiration techniques. A new aspiration method, the stylet slow-pull technique, involves slow withdrawal of the needle stylet to create minimum negative pressure.
up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield of different agitations
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Agitation means needle moving 10 or 20 or 30 times back and forth in lymph nodes per pass.
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jiayuan Sun

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 8, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SHCHE201901

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings