CT-guided Radioactive I-125 Seeds Implantation for Early Stage Lung Cancer

May 19, 2019 updated by: Peking University Third Hospital

Clinical Outcome of CT-guided Radioactive Iodine-125 Seeds Implantation for Inoperable Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

This study observes the efficacy and side effects of CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seed brachytherapy in inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer retrospectively, and analyzes the influence of clinical and dosimetric factors on the outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Radioactive Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy is a conventional treatment in Peking University Third Hospital. Radioactive Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy is the implantation of Iodine-125 seed into tumors.The radioactive Iodine-125 seed can release low dose of irradiation persistently which kills tumors cell and causes less damage to normal tissue at the same time. This study collects the data of patients with early stage (stage I-II, N0) non-small cell lung cancer who underwent CT-guided radioactive Iodine-125 seed implantation from 2010 to 2018. The investigators evaluate the dose that covers 90% target volume(D90) and other parameters after the implantation. The efficacy and adverse effects were observed. Local control(LC) time and overall survival(OS) time are evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seeds implantation during December 2010 to December 2018 were included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histological proven non-small cell lung cancer
  • UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage was T1-3N0M0 (stage Ia-IIb)
  • inoperable and CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seeds brachytherapy was used as the initial treatment without external beam radiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • actual dose of covers 90% target volume (D90) less than 100 Gy in postoperative validation
  • case information and/or follow-up information was unavailable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Early Stage Lung Cancer
The patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seeds implantation during December 2010 to December 2018.
Radiation: CT-guided Radioactive I-125 Seeds Implantation
The radioactive Iodine-125 seed can release low dose of irradiation persistently which kills tumors cell and causes less damage to normal tissue at the same time. The treatment was performed under CT monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local control time
Time Frame: Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.
The time from the date of seeds implantation to the date of recurrence of the implanted tumor or the date of last observation.
Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.
Overall survival time
Time Frame: Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.
The time from the date of seeds implantation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last observation.
Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after seeds implantation. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.
The adverse events were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). The rate of each adverse event was measured.
Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after seeds implantation. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University Third Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Junjie Wang, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 15, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CNRBG-81532-ESNSCLC-RISI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 6 months of the study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by an external Independent Review Panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings