Cap-assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy for Internal Hemorrhoids and Rectal Prolapse

April 1, 2024 updated by: Faming Zhang, The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Cap-assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy for Internal Hemorrhoids and Rectal Prolapse: a Nationwide Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long needle and short needle in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse through CAES (Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Traditional endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids require retroflection of the endoscope. Retroflection of the endoscope has blind areas and affects the precise operation. And, short-needle injection can easily lead to artificial ulcer and secondary bleeding. CAES is a new, minimally invasive endoscopic technique for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse. CAES was performed based on the requirement of the cap, endoscope, disposable endoscopic long injection needle, enough insufflated air and sclerosing agent. It can accurately control the injection angle, direction and depth under direct vision, and avoid iatrogenic injury caused by ectopic injection to the greatest possible extent. To investigate the effect of long needle and short needle on the outcome of CAES, participants with internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse were randomly assigned to a long needle group and a short needle group using a prospective, randomized, controlled study at multiple centers in China. The efficacy, adverse events and satisfaction of the two groups were observed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210011
        • Recruiting
        • Fmt-Dt-N-27/1350
        • Contact:
          • Faming Zhang, PhD,MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Faming Zhang, MD,PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse, combined with external hemorrhoids or without external hemorrhoids.
  2. Patients with bowel preparation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of anoscopic/endoscopic sclerotherapy.
  2. Patients with acute thrombotic external hemorrhoids.
  3. Patients with serious internal hemorrhoids of grade IV.
  4. Patients with anal stenosis, anal fissure, fistula, fecal incontinence, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease.
  5. Patients with acute diarrhea in the past 24 hours.
  6. Hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure, patients with cerebrovascular accident and obvious bleeding tendency, pregnant women, mental disorders and decompensated cirrhosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Long needle group
Participants were treated with CAES using long needle.
Procedure: Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy using long needle
Participants were treated with CAES using long needle.
Experimental: Short needle group
Participants were treated with CAES using short needle.
Procedure: Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy using short needle
Participants were treated with CAES using short needle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Recurrence rate defined as the proportion of patients with recurrent hemorrhoids at 24 weeks post-CAES, as derived from patients' self-reported answer. Patients will be considered to have recurrent hemorrhoids when any of the following are recorded: (1)"Unchanged or worse compared with before starting treatment" at 24th week as reported by the patient, or (2) seeking repeat CAES treatment, alternative non-surgical/surgical treatments for internal hemorrhoids within 24weeks (except medication treatment), or (3) presence of any symptoms or events that strongly indicated recurrent hemorrhoids among patients not meeting (1) or (2).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms of anal bleeding
Time Frame: 1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
Bleeding is divided into three degrees: 1. No bleeding; 2. 2: occasionally; 3: quite often.
1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
Symptoms of prolapse
Time Frame: 1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
There are three degrees of prolapse: 1. No prolapse; 2: occasionally; 3: quite often.
1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
Symptoms of anal pain
Time Frame: 1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
NRS pain digital rating scale was adopted, that is, 0-10 was used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 was painless, and 10 was severe pain. 0 painless, 1-3 mild pain (pain does not affect sleep), 4-6 moderate pain, 7-9 severe pain (inability to fall asleep or waking up during sleep), 10 severe pain.
1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
EQ-5D health scale scores
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Before CAES and after CAES, EQ-5D health scale scores were performed.
24 weeks
Adverse events and serious adverse events
Time Frame: 1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
Adverse events included bleeding, anal pain, and dyspnea.Serious adverse events include serious complications directly or indirectly related to the operation, such as death, bleeding, perforation, etc.
1day, 7days, 14days and 24 weeks
Satisfaction degree
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of satisfied participants
24 weeks
Symptom severity score
Time Frame: 1day and 24 weeks
five questions about hemorrhoidal symptoms (anal pain, prolapse, itching, soiling, and blood loss) will be self-assessed by patients by answering how often each symptom was encountered (never, sometimes, weekly, or daily). The score is the sum of the points from all five questions, ranging from 0 to 15 points, where an increase in number is an increase in symptom.
1day and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Faming Zhang, MD,PhD, The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 27, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAES-CN-190318

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings