Efficacy of an Exercise Program for Patients With Femoro-acetabular Impingement
Efficacy of a Non-surgical Treatment Protocol for Patients With Symptomatic Femoro-acetabular Impingement: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Lissa Pacheco, PhD (c)
- Phone Number: 613-737-8920
- Email: lipacheco@ohri.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
- The Ottawa Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with symptomatic FAI
- at least 3 months of groin pain
- increased pain with hip rotation
- an alpha angle greater than 60 degrees on multiplane imaging
- labral tear on MRI
- Tonnis grade of 0 or 1
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed health problems other than FAI interfering with capacity to accomplish the exercise program
- previous hip surgery on the affected side
- surgery will happen within 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise Group
The group who will exercise to manage pain.
|
The group who will meet a physiotherapist who will show them strengthening and stretching muscles associated with pelvic tilt.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
The group who will not take part in any exercises and only have to do assessments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
iHOT-33
Time Frame: Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months
|
International Hip Outcome Tool-33, disease-specific function.
Each answer will be measured on a scale of 100mm and the mean of the 33 questions will be taken as a final score.
A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
|
Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants that receive hip surgery
Time Frame: Change in Baseline before exercise program and 1 year afterwards
|
If the participant has hip surgery in the time frame
|
Change in Baseline before exercise program and 1 year afterwards
|
|
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months afterward
|
Generic quality of life, the scores for each question are summed up for a total with a higher score being a better quality of life.
|
Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months afterward
|
|
Patient-reported hip pain
Time Frame: Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months
|
Patient perceived pain on a VAS scale
|
Change in Baseline before exercise program and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul Beaule, MD, FRCSC, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khanna V, Beaule PE. Defining structural abnormalities of the hip joint at risk of degeneration. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2014 Sep 6;1(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnu004. eCollection 2014 Jul.
- Khanna V, Caragianis A, Diprimio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Incidence of hip pain in a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers: is the cam deformity a risk factor for hip pain? Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):793-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546513518417. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
- Diamond LE, Dobson FL, Bennell KL, Wrigley TV, Hodges PW, Hinman RS. Physical impairments and activity limitations in people with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;49(4):230-42. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093340. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
- Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 20;92(14):2436-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01280.
- Peters CL. Mild to Moderate Hip OA: Joint Preservation or Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.046. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
- Beaule PE, Singh A, Poitras S, Parker G. Surgical Dislocation of the Hip for the Treatment of Pre-Arthritic Hip Disease. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1502-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
- Speirs AD, Beaule PE, Rakhra KS, Schweitzer ME, Frei H. Increased acetabular subchondral bone density is associated with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Apr;21(4):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
- Speirs AD, Beaule PE, Huang A, Frei H. Properties of the cartilage layer from the cam-type hip impingement deformity. J Biomech. 2017 Apr 11;55:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
- Carsen S, Moroz PJ, Rakhra K, Ward LM, Dunlap H, Hay JA, Willis RB, Beaule PE. The Otto Aufranc Award. On the etiology of the cam deformity: a cross-sectional pediatric MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):430-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2990-y.
- Gala L, Khanna V, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE. Does the femoral head/neck contour in the skeletally mature change over time? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Aug 3;3(4):333-337. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw022. eCollection 2016 Oct.
- Li X, Majumdar S. Quantitative MRI of articular cartilage and its clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Nov;38(5):991-1008. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24313. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
- Anwander H, Melkus G, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE. T1rho MRI detects cartilage damage in asymptomatic individuals with a cam deformity. J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):1004-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.23101. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
- Beaule PE, Speirs AD, Anwander H, Melkus G, Rakhra K, Frei H, Lamontagne M. Surgical Correction of Cam Deformity in Association with Femoroacetabular Impingement and Its Impact on the Degenerative Process within the Hip Joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 16;99(16):1373-1381. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00415.
- Fairley J, Wang Y, Teichtahl AJ, Seneviwickrama M, Wluka AE, Brady SRE, Hussain SM, Liew S, Cicuttini FM. Management options for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of symptom and structural outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Oct;24(10):1682-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
- Wall PD, Fernandez M, Griffin DR, Foster NE. Nonoperative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. PM R. 2013 May;5(5):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
- Lamontagne M, Kennedy MJ, Beaule PE. The effect of cam FAI on hip and pelvic motion during maximum squat. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):645-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0620-x. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
- Seijas R, Alentorn-Geli E, Alvarez-Diaz P, Marin M, Ares O, Sallent A, Cusco X, Cugat R. Gluteus maximus impairment in femoroacetabular impingement: a tensiomyographic evaluation of a clinical fact. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jun;136(6):785-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2428-6. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
- Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A. Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2402-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541229. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
- Nepple JJ, Prather H, Trousdale RT, Clohisy JC, Beaule PE, Glyn-Jones S, Kim YJ. Clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21 Suppl 1:S16-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-07-S16.
- Nwachukwu BU, Fields K, Chang B, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS. Preoperative Outcome Scores Are Predictive of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):612-619. doi: 10.1177/0363546516669325. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
- Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Taylor JB, Dischiavi SL, Stubbs AJ. Non-operative management of femoroacetabular impingement: A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial pilot study. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Sep;19(9):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.008. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Coppack RJ, Bilzon JL, Wills AK, McCurdie IM, Partridge LK, Nicol AM, Bennett AN. Physical and functional outcomes following multidisciplinary residential rehabilitation for prearthritic hip pain among young active UK military personnel. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016 Apr 1;2(1):e000107. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000107. eCollection 2016.
- Griffin D, Wall P, Realpe A, Adams A, Parsons N, Hobson R, Achten J, Fry J, Costa M, Petrou S, Foster N, Donovan J. UK FASHIoN: feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with best conservative care. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(32):1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta20320.
- Crawford MJ, Dy CJ, Alexander JW, Thompson M, Schroder SJ, Vega CE, Patel RV, Miller AR, McCarthy JC, Lowe WR, Noble PC. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:16-22. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815b181f.
- Kapron AL, Aoki SK, Peters CL, Anderson AE. Subject-specific patterns of femur-labrum contact are complex and vary in asymptomatic hips and hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3912-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3919-9. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
- Savic D, Pedoia V, Seo Y, Yang J, Bucknor M, Franc BL, Majumdar S. Imaging Bone-Cartilage Interactions in Osteoarthritis Using [18F]-NaF PET-MRI. Mol Imaging. 2016 Jan 1;15:1-12. doi: 10.1177/1536012116683597.
- Pierannunzii L. Pelvic posture and kinematics in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Sep;18(3):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0439-2. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20190091
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.