POC SPLA2-IIA as a Biomarker for Sepsis and Septic Shock

May 15, 2019 updated by: rebecca jeanmonod, St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvania

Bedside Measurements of a Novel Biomarker SPLA2-IIA as a Marker of an Inflammatory Response and Predictor of Sepsis in Patients Meeting SIRS or qSOFA Criteria: a Pilot Study

Septic shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) can progress over hours to days to severe sepsis and septic shock. Currently, lactate levels are used to guide resuscitative efforts and have been shown to be a predictor of mortality independent of vital sign abnormalities (1). However, their use seems to be limited to trending in a given patient, and not for prognostic value of a single level (2). This is because there is significant overlap in lactate levels of individuals who progress to death and multisystem organ failure as compared to those who do not (2). Blood cultures are also extensively used to detect blood stream infection (BSI), but these are time consuming and are not immediately useful to clinicians caring for sick patients.

A biomarker that adequately distinguishes between patients at high risk for progression to severe sepsis/shock/death and those who will not would be helpful in the appropriate initiation of aggressive treatment and appropriate disposition of patients in clinical care. Previously, the investigators demonstrated that sPLA2-IIA detected by ELISA assay had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91% in detecting sepsis (3). Zeus Pharmaceuticals has developed a bedside point-of-care test measuring sPLA2-IIA in real time. The investigators propose to study this assay in terms of its discriminatory value in distinguishing between SIRS from non-infectious causes, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in a cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department at Anderson and Bethlehem campuses. The investigators propose to better define the threshold level for this marker assay as well as seek to establish its utility in a clinical population.

The investigators will take samples of blood from emergency department patients presenting who meet SIRS criteria or have a positive q-SOFA screen. The investigators will take subsequent samples of blood when lactate levels are redrawn as per St. Luke's sepsis protocol. After informed consent is obtained, blood specimens will be run in analyzer provided by Zeus for sPLA2-IIA. The investigators will record presence and quantity of sPLA2-IIA, as well as other markers of sepsis such as lactate, vital signs, blood cultures, and patient oriented outcomes (ie ICU days, organ dysfunction, and survival to discharge). Printouts from analyzer will be stored in locked cabinet, and remaining blood will be discarded. The data will then be compiled by the investigators at St. Luke's University Hospital. The results will be correlated with the patients' clinical progression to determine the biomarker's utility and cut-off values for predicting progression of SIRS.

As clear threshold levels for this marker have yet to be defined, the investigators would like to enroll patients meeting criteria until the investigators have enrolled 50 patients with septic shock. It is anticipated that, proportionally, this will lead to enrollment of 75-100 patients with severe sepsis, 100-150 patients with sepsis, and 100-150 patients meeting SIRS criteria who are not septic. This will help delineate if there is any value in this assay for distinguishing among the severity of sepsis pathophysiology.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
        • Recruiting
        • St. Luke's University Health Network
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

emergency department patients with positive sepsis screens

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presenting to emergency department with positive sepsis screen including 2 SIRS criteria or positive q-sofa score regardless of reasons for positive screen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to consent or to have surrogate consent, identification after resuscitation or after blood has already been drawn, age less than 18, pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
septic shock
Diagnostic test: SPLA2-IIA
bedside blood test
severe sepsis
Diagnostic test: SPLA2-IIA
bedside blood test
sepsis
Diagnostic test: SPLA2-IIA
bedside blood test
sirs positive, not septic
Diagnostic test: SPLA2-IIA
bedside blood test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
level greater than 25ng
Time Frame: baseline
threshold level of spla2-IIA
baseline
level greater than 25ng
Time Frame: 2 hours
threshold level of spla2-IIA
2 hours
level greater than 25ng
Time Frame: 24 hour lab draw
threshold level of spla2-IIA
24 hour lab draw

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SLIR 2019-23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on SPLA2-IIA

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings