The Impact of a Technology-enabled Decision Aid, for Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis on Decision Quality, Level of Shared Decision-making, Patient Satisfaction and Magnitude of Limitations
A Technology-enabled Decision Aid for Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
- UT Health Austin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients with a presumptive diagnosis of knee OA aged between 45 and 89 (in-line with the decision aid algorithm)
- Radiographic evidence of moderate to severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3-4)
- KOOS Jr scores between 0-85 (in-line with the decision-aid algorithm)
- Participant able to give informed consent for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Kellgren and Lawrence scale for classification of osteoarthritis grade 0-2
- Patients with a prior experience of total joint replacement
- Patient with experience with the pilot form of the decision aid
- Patients undergoing consideration for revision joint replacement
- Patients seeking care for trauma condition or psoriatic/rheumatoid arthritis
- Non-English or Non-Spanish speakers
- Patients with BMI below 20 or above 46 (in-line with the decision-aid algorithm)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Full decision aid, consisting of education on osteoarthritis and treatment options, preferences and values elicitation, and personalized risk/benefit estimates based on patient's response to patient-reported outcome measures.
|
Decision aid meant to improve shared decision making among patients and providers.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Education component of the decision aid only.
|
Investigator-written educational material and quiz to test knowledge of osteoarthritis and treatment options.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Decision process subscore.
Participants receive 1 point for a response of "yes" or "a lot/some."
The total points are summed and then divided by the total number of items to result in scores from 0-100%, with higher scores indicated a more shared decision making process.
|
Day 1
|
|
Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Concordance subscore (A summary score (0-100%) indicating the percentage of patients who received treatment that matched their stated preference will be generated.)
|
Day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
CollaboRATE
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Level of shared decision making.
Range of 0-9.
Higher scores represent more shared decision making.
|
Day 1
|
|
Numeric rating scale-satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Patient satisfaction with management of condition.
Range of 0-10 with 0 representing complete dissatisfaction and 10 representing complete satisfaction.
|
Day 1
|
|
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, joint replacement (KOOS JR)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline visit
|
Measure of patient-reported, knee-related stiffness, pain, and function.
Raw score range 0-28, converted to interval score of 0-100, where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health.
|
6 months after baseline visit
|
|
Undergoing joint replacement surgery or not
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Decision to undergo total knee replacement surgery (yes/no).
Obtained by asking provider or through medical record note.
|
Day 1
|
|
Average time of patient visit and average time spent with provider
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Minutes.
Time of entire visit will be recorded in addition to time spent with primary provider.
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kevin Bozic, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-11-0042
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.