Stem Cell Therapy for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

February 6, 2026 updated by: Sophie Deng, MD, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Safety and Feasibility of Cultivated Autologous Limbal Stem Cells (cLSC) for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

This phase I study will collect preliminary information on the activity and safety of cLSC. We will investigate the ability to manufacture and transplant cLSC onto the cornea successfully at the time of surgery (feasibility), and have cLSC begin to populate the ocular surface (efficacy) without serious adverse events (safety).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

20 patients with severe to total Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD) in one eye attributable to injury or ocular surgery. The first 5 eyes will receive the cLSCs to determine the feasibility and safety. Then the subsequent 15 eyes will be randomized into cLSC group and a scleral lens treatment (SCL) control group in a 2:1 ratio in blocks of 3 or 6 using a random number generator.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Main inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female ≥18 years of age.
  2. Best corrected visual acuity in the affected eye of 20/160 or less.
  3. Documentation of a LSCD diagnosis and the central cornea is affected.
  4. Absence of lagophthalmos and eyelid abnormality
  5. Adequate forniceal depth is ≥ 5 mm.
  6. LSCD fails to resolve by surgical treatments of the ocular surface during the previous 6 months of screening visit.
  7. If the etiology of LSCD is due to chemical injury, a minimal interval of 1 year since the initial chemical injury is required.
  8. A Schirmer test result at 5 minute of ≥5 mm of wetting.
  9. Absence of active infectious keratitis in either eye at the Enrollment Visit.
  10. Have a life expectancy ≥ 2 years after enrollment.

Main exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study.
  2. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  3. Exposure keratopathy or lagophthalmos of the study eye.
  4. Persistent severe ocular surface inflammation and/or meibomian gland dysfunction
  5. Chemical injury occurred less than 12 months ago.
  6. Presence of ocular surface tumor.
  7. Uncontrolled diabetes with last hemoglobin A1C (HgA1C) >8.5.
  8. Presence of known allergies to any of the cLSC components.
  9. Current participation in another simultaneous medical investigation or trial.
  10. Unable to be compliant with or complete the requirements of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cultivated Limbal Stem-Cells (cLSC)
One dose of cultivated limbal stem-cells (cLSC), size between 7.6 to 15 mm in the average diameter.
Biological: cLSC
Transplantation of cLSC
Active Comparator: Scleral Contact Lens Device (SCL)
Scleral contact lens device (SCL) will be fitted to stabilize and improve ocular surface.
Device: Scleral contact lens (SCL)
Scleral contact lens device (SCL) will be used to stabilize and improve ocular surface.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of cLSC Transplant pertaining to Infection and/or Corneal Perforation
Time Frame: 12 months for all participants
Safety assessed by incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) directly related to cLSC: infection and/or corneal perforation.
12 months for all participants
Feasibility of cLSC Transplant pertaining to Manufacturing meeting Release Criteria
Time Frame: 12 months for all participants
Feasibility assessed by successful manufacturing of cLSC from biopsy that meets release criteria.
12 months for all participants
Feasibility of cLSC Transplant pertaining to Manufacturing without Contamination
Time Frame: 12 months for all participants
Feasibility assessed by successful cLSC manufacturing without contamination.
12 months for all participants

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Area of Corneal Epithelial Defect
Time Frame: At 6 months and 12 months in both cLSC and the control groups
Evaluate changes in the area of corneal epithelial defect (ED) or lack of ED.
At 6 months and 12 months in both cLSC and the control groups
Changes in the Clinical Score
Time Frame: At 6 months and 12 months in both cLSC and the control groups
Evaluate changes in the clinical score determined by slit lamp examination using fluorescein staining and confocal imaging.
At 6 months and 12 months in both cLSC and the control groups

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sophie Deng, MD, PhD, Stein Eye Institute UCLA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 4, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • V001
  • R01EY021797 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings