Safety Trial of OPC-61815 Injection in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Who Have Difficulty With or Are Incapable of Oral Intake
A Multicenter, Open-label, Uncontrolled Clinical Trial to Confirm the Tolerability of OPC-61815 in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Who Have Difficulty With or Are Incapable of Oral Intake
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gifu, Japan
- Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving loop diuretic injection at a dose equivalent to furosemide 20 mg/day or higher
- CHF patients in whom lower limb edema, pulmonary congestion, and/or jugular venous distension due to volume overload is present
- Patients who are judged by the investigator or subinvestigator to have difficulty or be incapable of oral intake, including patients who are judged by the investigator or subinvestigator to require nothing by mouth(NPO) management
- Patients who are currently hospitalized or who are capable of being hospitalized from the time of informed consent until the end of the treatment period
- Patients who are capable of giving informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are on a ventricular assist device
- Patients who have difficulty with spontaneous respiration or who have been on tracheal intubation under sedative therapy
- Patients with severe disturbed consciousness (ie, coma or stupor)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: OPC-61815 injection
Intravenous administration of OPC-61815 at 8 mg or 16 mg once daily for a maximum of 5 days.
Starting with 8mg, increase the dose to 16mg on Day 2 or Day 3, according to the dose escalation criteria.
|
Intravenous administration of OPC-61815 at 8 mg or 16 mg once daily for a maximum of 5 days.
Starting with 8mg, increase the dose to 16mg on Day 2 or Day 3, according to the dose escalation criteria.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From the start of IMP administration (Day 1) up to 15 days
|
"An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical trial subject administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE (SAE) is an AE that leads to death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or any other important medical event which is medically significant. A TEAE is an AE that occurs only after a subject has received IMP. |
From the start of IMP administration (Day 1) up to 15 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
Change in body weight from baseline (before IMP administration on Day 1) at time of final IMP administration (day after final IMP administration).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
|
Improvement Rate for Lower Limb Edema
Time Frame: Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
The improvement rate was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom a symptom was present at baseline and then markedly improved or improved after IMP administration. Improvement category is a 4-point scale below:
|
Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
|
Improvement Rate for Pulmonary Congestion
Time Frame: Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
The improvement rate was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom a symptom was present at baseline and then markedly improved or improved after IMP administration. Improvement category is a 4-point scale below:
|
Baseline, Day after final IMP administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 263-102-00004
- JapicCTI-194715 (OTHER: JapicCTI)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.