Stent Therapy Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy (EsoLeak)

April 27, 2021 updated by: Seung-Hun Chon, University Hospital of Cologne

Endoscopic Management of ESOphago-gastric Anastomotic LEAKages (EsoLeak): Stent Therapy Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy

Exploratory study of the efficiency of endoscopic stenting versus endoscopic vacuum therapy in patients with intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomotic leakage after oncological resection of the esophagus.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We analyze the outcome of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
        • Contact:
    • NRW
      • Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
        • University Hospital of Cologne
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Seung-Hun Chon, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with an intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomotic leak after oncologic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed oesophageal carcinoma or similarly operated neoplasia (e.g., GIST, NET, subepithelial tumors)
  • Esophagectomy with an intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis
  • Radiologically or endoscopically diagnosed esophago-gastric anastomotic leakage
  • Clinical symptoms / symptoms due to insufficiency or increase in signs of inflammation, most likely as a result of anastomotic leakage
  • Age ≥18 years
  • To empower the patient to understand the scope of the study and its consequences or information, to consent to it and to sign the educational documents.
  • Written declaration of consent of the patient to be included. If the patient is unable to sign by hand, a witness must confirm the oral examination by signature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Macroscopically incompletely resected tumor (R2), palliative resection
  • Endoscopically verified necrosis or critical ischemia of the anastomotic region of the interponate
  • Size of insufficiency more than 50% of circumference
  • Impossibility of radiological interventional insertion of a drainage
  • Early anastomotic leak (≤ 48 hours postoperatively), late insufficiencies (> 4 weeks)
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Severe septic shock that indicates surgical therapy
  • Pregnant and lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
SEMS Group
The outcome of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy
Device: Self-Expanding Metal Stent
Endoscopically placed self-expanding-metal-stent (SEMS) for negative pressure wound therapy in the area of the esophagogastric anastomotic leaks
Other Names:
  • SEMS, stent
EVT Group
The outcome of using endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy
Device: EsoSponge
Endoscopically placed an EsoSponge for Negative pressure wound therapy in the area of the esophagogastric anastomotic leaks
Other Names:
  • Negative pressure wound therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction of treatment assessed by EORTC QLQ - OES18
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessing the quality of life of patients during the treatment of stent and EVT with a questionnaire by EORTC QLQ - OES18. This Questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital of Cologne

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Seung-Hun Chon, MD, University Hospital of Cologne
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Tachezy, MD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-1201

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings