Effects of an Acute and Chronic Training Protocol Associated to the Inter-set Velocity Loss

May 24, 2019 updated by: Alejandro Muñoz López

Neuromuscular, Physiological and Performance Changes After an Acute and Chronic Training Protocol Associated to the Inter-set Velocity Loss

This study evaluates different performance, physiological and neuromuscular changes after acute and chronic resistance training intervention in physically active men. The participants will train with a single exercise (full squat) and will be monitored with a linear encoder. The experiment will consist of between 3 to 6 sets between 70% to 85% of 1RM in the full squat exercise. Two main groups will form the intervention: one group will perform inter-set repetitions until there will be a 20% of velocity loss compared to the first repetition, while the second group will have a 40% of velocity loss.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The main dependent variables and instruments will be:

  1. Tensyomiography: neuromuscular properties of the vastus lateral (VL), rectus femoris (RF) and vastus medialis (VM) from the dominant leg.
  2. Force platform: kinetic variables in relation to a countermovement jump.
  3. Near-infrared spectrography: oxygen saturation in the VL and VM.
  4. Termographic camera: low limbs temperatura.
  5. Linear encoder: mean propulsive velocity from each repetition
  6. Electromyography: amplitude and frequency parameters related to a knee extension maximum voluntary contraction test.
  7. Strain gauge: maximum isometric force.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Alejandro Muñoz López, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0034 699661447
  • Email: amunoz26@us.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be healthy
  • Without injuries or actual illnesses
  • More than 2 years of experience in resistance training or federative sports

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be sick or injured
  • To have programmed during the intervention phase a dramatic change in the lifestyle

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 20% velocity loss
This group will train with a variable number of repetitions during each set. The group will stop the set once the mean propulsive velocity will be 20% less compared to the first repetition.
Other: Acute changes
In a crossover design, participants will be randomized to perform on Day 1, 3 sets of repetitions (depending on each treatment group) at 70% or 1RM in the full squat exercise. 48-h later, same will be performed but in the contrary crossover arm.
Other: Chronic changes
In a randomized control trial, participants will train during 6 weeks the full squat exercise, 2 days in the week (minimum between-days rest of 48h). Intensity will vary from 70% to 85 of 1RM, and training volume from 3 to 6 sets.
Other: Familiarization
Prior to any intervention, all participants will perform a familiarization of the exercise session, together with a progressive resistance test to estimate the 1 RM
Experimental: 40% velocity loss
This group will train with a variable number of repetitions during each set. The group will stop the set once the mean propulsive velocity will be 40% less compared to the first repetition.
Other: Acute changes
In a crossover design, participants will be randomized to perform on Day 1, 3 sets of repetitions (depending on each treatment group) at 70% or 1RM in the full squat exercise. 48-h later, same will be performed but in the contrary crossover arm.
Other: Chronic changes
In a randomized control trial, participants will train during 6 weeks the full squat exercise, 2 days in the week (minimum between-days rest of 48h). Intensity will vary from 70% to 85 of 1RM, and training volume from 3 to 6 sets.
Other: Familiarization
Prior to any intervention, all participants will perform a familiarization of the exercise session, together with a progressive resistance test to estimate the 1 RM
Placebo Comparator: Control group
This group will be just tested as a control group.
Other: Chronic changes
In a randomized control trial, participants will train during 6 weeks the full squat exercise, 2 days in the week (minimum between-days rest of 48h). Intensity will vary from 70% to 85 of 1RM, and training volume from 3 to 6 sets.
Other: Familiarization
Prior to any intervention, all participants will perform a familiarization of the exercise session, together with a progressive resistance test to estimate the 1 RM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contraction time
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Time between 10% to 90% on the displacement-time curve assessed with the Tensiomiograhpy
7 weeks
Maximum displacement
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Maximum displacement point the displacement-time curve assessed with the Tensiomiograhpy
7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinetic variables in the jump
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Kinetic variables related to the force-time curve registered with the force platform during jumps
7 weeks
Muscle tissue oxygen
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Oxygen in the muscle tissue assessed via near-infrared spectroscopy
7 weeks
Muscle temperature
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Low limb muscles temperature assessed with a termographic camera
7 weeks
Mean propulsive velocity
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Individual repetitions mean propulsive velocity during the full squat exercise, assessed with a linear encoder
7 weeks
Amplitude (RMS) and frequency outputs
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Muscle electrical activity assessed with an EMG
7 weeks
Peak isometric force
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Maximum force achieved during a knee extension at 120º
7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alejandro Muñoz López

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Alejandro Muñoz López, PhD, Internship
  • Principal Investigator: Jesus Gustavo Ponce, PhD, Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TMG_velocity_lost

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings