Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability and Pain Control
Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability and Pain Control Between Two Anesthesia Positions of Lateral and Prone in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy; a Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Inclusion criteria were age between 18-65 years,
- having kidney stones; consent for spinal anesthesia,
- ASA classes (American Society of Anesthesiologists class) of 1 and 2 (patients without any cardiovascular or respiratory disorders)
- superior and median ureter larger than 20 mm in diameter.
Exclusion Criteria:
- those with coagulation defects,
- severe pain requiring more than one dose of fentanyl,
- considerable rise of blood pressure or heart rate during the operation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Lateral position
The patient position was changed to lateral during surgery
|
Patient's pain in order to VAS
changes in hemodynamic states
|
|
Active Comparator: prone position
The patient position was changed to prone during surgery
|
Patient's pain in order to VAS
changes in hemodynamic states
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain intensity in VAS score and need for analgesics in milligram
Time Frame: at one year after surgery
|
determining pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and need for analgesics (milligram) in lateral versus prone position.
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is usually presented as a 100-mm horizontal line on which the patient's pain intensity is represented by a point between the extremes of "no pain at all" and "worst pain imaginable."
Its simplicity, reliability, and validity, as well as its ratio scale properties, make the VAS the optimal tool for describing pain severity or intensity.
|
at one year after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
hemodynamic state
Time Frame: at one year after surgery
|
changes in blood pressure
|
at one year after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Hamidreza Shemshaki, MD, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 121333P
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.