The Vestibular Socket Therapy : A Novel Concept for Immediate Implant Placement in Defective Fresh Extraction Sites
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt
- Private Practice Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A hopeless single tooth in the maxillary anterior region
- Sufficient apical bone to allow adequate anchorage/primary stability of the implant
- had natural teeth present adjacent to the tooth being replaced
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of acute infection
- Impossibility of reaching adequate implant primary stability in the native
- Smokers of > 10 cigarettes
- Antitumor chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the previous year
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: xenograft cortical flexible sheet
a-traumatic tooth removal , socket lavage and curettage, performing a vestibular access horizontal incision corresponding to the socket 3-4 mm apically from the muccogingival junction , a tunnel is then created from the socket office and extended apically till it connects with the vestibular access incision, a computer guided surgical template is then used to deliver the implant in its optimal position, a slowly resorbable membrane shield is then introduced through the tunnel and stabilized with a membrane tac , it is a sturdy fixable membrane barrier placed above the labial plate
|
a slowly resorbable membrane shield is placed above the labial plate of bone so that when the thin labial plate started its resorption process the shield remains till a complete gap fill occurred thus leading to a thicker labial plate of bone or it preserves the socket architecture until a complete bone fill occurred inside the socket
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
radiographic buccal bone thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
preoperative and follow up CBCTs are superimposed on each other and buccal bone thickness is measure at 3 similar points on both CBCTs and then a mean is calculated
|
6 months
|
|
radiographic buccal bone height
Time Frame: 6 months
|
preoperative and follow up CBCTs are superimposed on each other and buccal bone height is measured in relation to implant shoulder level
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
final esthetic outcome of soft tissue
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Pink esthetic score.
based on subjective assessment of mesial papilla, distal papilla, midfacial level, midfacial contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color and texture.
each item is given a score between 0 and 2, where 0 is the worst and 2 is the best outcome.
Then, a final score ranging between 0-14 is calculated
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Abdelsalam Elaskary, University of New York
- Principal Investigator: Yasmine Y Gaweesh, PhD, Alexandria University
- Principal Investigator: Paul Rosen, DMD, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore
- Principal Investigator: Moataz Meabed, Msc, Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Cairo University. Egypt
- Study Director: Sang-Choon Cho, DDS, NYU College of Dentistry, USA.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.
- Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217.
- Meijer HJA, Slagter KW, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with large bony defects at time of immediate implant placement: A 1-year cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):73-79. doi: 10.1111/cid.12701. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
- Barroso-Panella A, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Evaluation of Bone Stability and Esthetic Results After Immediate Implant Placement Using a Novel Synthetic Bone Substitute in the Anterior Zone: Results After 12 Months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Mar/Apr;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.11607/prd.2863.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- nonstaged socket therapy
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.