Oral Vancomycin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)

April 19, 2023 updated by: University of South Florida

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Placebo Controlled Study To Determine the Effectiveness of Oral Vancomycin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)

The purpose of this study is to gain further knowledge regarding the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis in preventing Clostridium difficile infections in order to guide physicians' practices.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and health care related costs. Up to 30% of CDI cases recur, resulting in 83,000 cases of recurrent CDI per year in the US. Although agents for primary and secondary prophylaxis for CDI including the use of probiotics, antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplantations, and newer therapies such as bezlotoxumab have been reported, there are no consensus guidelines regarding their use.

In order to understand current practices regarding secondary prophylaxis for CDI, a nationwide survey to assess physician practices regarding secondary prophylaxis for CDI. A total of 246 surveys were completed. Physicians were surveyed from greater than 100 locations. Most providers (N=173, 71%) reported using secondary prophylaxis for CDI prevention. The majority (N=138, 56%) were infectious disease providers. Vancomycin (N=121, 70%) and probiotics (N=114, 66%) were most commonly used for CDI secondary prophylaxis. Of 164 respondents who used secondary prophylaxis, 29.9% (N=49) utilized it for patients with a history of CDI who were receiving antibiotics, while 54.2% (N=89), used prophylaxis for patients with a history of recurrent CDI (more than 2 episodes) receiving antibiotics.

Despite the lack of guideline recommendations or definitive studies to support secondary prophylaxis for CDI, the majority of the physicians who responded to this survey are using secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent CDI. The purpose of our study is to determine the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis with oral vancomycin vs. placebo for the prevention of recurrent clostridium difficile infection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Kristen Zeitler, PharmD
  • Phone Number: 813-384-8270
  • Email: kzeitler@tgh.org

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • Infectious Disease Associates of Tampa Bay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to Tampa General Hospital or outpatients at Infectious Disease Associates of Tampa Bay clinics who are receiving systemic antibiotics and have a history of at least one episode of CDI.
  • Participants must at least 18 years of age to participate.
  • Participants must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent form prior to initiation of study procedures.
  • Expected to receive at least 3 days of systemic antibiotics.
  • Life expectancy greater than 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current CDI
  • Completion of treatment for CDI within the last 15 days
  • Concurrent use of drugs that have activity against C. difficile such as metronidazole, fidaxomicin, nitazoxanide, tigecycline, or rifaximine
  • Concurrent use of cholestyramine
  • Concurrent use of bezlotoxumab
  • Concurrent use of probiotics
  • Concurrent use of Imodium or other antidiarrheal agents.
  • Chronic suppressive antibiotics
  • Condition which causes chronic diarrhea such as inflammatory bowel disease
  • Bacterial gastroenteritis other than CDI
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Allergy to oral Vancomycin
  • Inability to take enteric medications
  • Have an unstable or life limiting condition on admission
  • Already participating in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Study drug
Oral vancomycin 125mg twice a day prescribed for the duration of antibiotics
Drug: Oral Vancomycin
Oral vancomycin 125mg twice a day prescribed for the duration of antibiotics
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matched placebo twice a day prescribed for the duration of antibiotics
Other: Placebo
Matched placebo twice a day prescribed for the duration of antibiotics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: 90 days

Diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile infection to assess recurrence rates

Participants will be called at the completion of systemic antibiotics and 1, 2 and 3 months thereafter to assess for recurrence. If participants were tested for C. difficile at another facility records will be obtained to confirm recurrent infection.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk factors associated clostridium difficile infection recurrences
Time Frame: Day 0 - data will be collection upon enrollment
Assess any risk factors associated development of recurrence such as age, number of clostridium difficile infections in the past, what antibiotics the patient has been exposed to, and exposure to proton pump inhibitors
Day 0 - data will be collection upon enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of South Florida

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mindy Sampson, DO, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00037626

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings