Register of Patients Benefiting From a Coronary Bifurcation Angioplasty at the University Hospital of Nîmes and Montpellier in 2017 (Register)

July 5, 2019 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Cardiovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death in France and the world's leading cause.Coronary bifurcations are conducive to the development of atheromatous lesions due to flow turbulence generating a pro-atherogenic effect. They represent about 15% of coronary lesions and 30% of lesions in pluri truncular patients.Coronary bifurcation angioplasty is a complex angioplasty with a high risk of complications.Numerous studies have compared different angioplasty techniques with 2 stents in bifurcation lesions. However, two studies of The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study did not show at 6 months or 5 years of age any significant difference in major cardiovascular events (death, heart attack, stent thrombosis, emergency revascularization of the target vessel) in patients with a one-stent strategy compared to the systematic use of two stents. There are also several post-expansion techniques and the one that appears to be the most commonly used today (known as the "KISSING-BALLOON") consists of inflating two balloons at the same time, one in the main branch and the other in the daughter branch in order to open the meshes of the stent towards the daughter branch. Studies on a test bench to evaluate the deformation of a stent in different coronary anatomies according to the material and technique used have nevertheless revealed several limitations to this technique, in particular an elliptical deformation of the stent linked to the inflation of 2 simultaneous balloons.

From this work, a new technique known as "POT SIDE POT" was born, consisting in post dilating the proximal part of the stent of the main branch in order to place it as closely as possible against the wall, then open the stent meshes towards the lateral branch by balloon dilation followed by a new post dilation of the proximal part of the mother branch stent to avoid the use of 2 simultaneous balloons and thus reduce stent deformation by maintaining a circular geometry while allowing proper stent attachment.

However, to date, there are no clinical studies comparing the POT SIDE POT technique with that of KISSING-BALLOON in coronary bifurcation angioplasty.

This is why we would like to compare these two post-dilation techniques by a retrospective study on the occurrence of major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis in patients who received a coronary bifurcation angioplasty in 2017 at the University Hospital of Nîmes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death in France and the world's leading cause.Coronary bifurcations are conducive to the development of atheromatous lesions due to flow turbulence generating a pro-atherogenic effect. They represent about 15% of coronary lesions and 30% of lesions in pluri truncular patients.Coronary bifurcation angioplasty is a complex angioplasty with a high risk of complications.Numerous studies have compared different angioplasty techniques with 2 stents in bifurcation lesions. However, two studies of The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study did not show at 6 months or 5 years of age any significant difference in major cardiovascular events (death, heart attack, stent thrombosis, emergency revascularization of the target vessel) in patients with a one-stent strategy compared to the systematic use of two stents. There are also several post-expansion techniques and the one that appears to be the most commonly used today (known as the "KISSING-BALLOON") consists of inflating two balloons at the same time, one in the main branch and the other in the daughter branch in order to open the meshes of the stent towards the daughter branch. Studies on a test bench to evaluate the deformation of a stent in different coronary anatomies according to the material and technique used have nevertheless revealed several limitations to this technique, in particular an elliptical deformation of the stent linked to the inflation of 2 simultaneous balloons.

From this work, a new technique known as "POT SIDE POT" was born, consisting in post dilating the proximal part of the stent of the main branch in order to place it as closely as possible against the wall, then open the stent meshes towards the lateral branch by balloon dilation followed by a new post dilation of the proximal part of the mother branch stent to avoid the use of 2 simultaneous balloons and thus reduce stent deformation by maintaining a circular geometry while allowing proper stent attachment.

However, to date, there are no clinical studies comparing the POT SIDE POT technique with that of KISSING-BALLOON in coronary bifurcation angioplasty.

This is why we would like to compare these two post-dilation techniques by a retrospective study on the occurrence of major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis in patients who received a coronary bifurcation angioplasty in 2017 at the University Hospital of Nîmes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
143

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHU de Nîmes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • All angioplasties of bifurcation lesion to a de novo stent defined by :
  • MEDINA classification 1,1,1,1 or 0,1,1,1 or 1,0,1

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All angioplasties of bifurcation lesion to a de novo stent defined by :
  • MEDINA classification 1,1,1,1 or 0,1,1,1 or 1,0,1
  • Diameter of the mother and daughter branch > 2.5mm
  • No history of angioplasty of this bifurcation (de novo lesion)
  • Accessible for coronary angioplasty treatment
  • Patients admitted to the University Hospital of Nîmes from January 1 to December 31, 2017

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patient
  • Bifurcation lesion not meeting the above criteria
  • Cardiorespiratory arrest
  • Injury on bypass surgery
  • Intrastent restenosis
  • 2-stent angioplasty technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of a composite criterion associating major ischemic events (Major adverse Cardiac Events: death from any cause, myocardial infarction, need for revascularization) and the occurrence of stent thrombosis during hospitalization.
Time Frame: within one year
Occurrence of a composite criterion associating major ischemic events (Major adverse Cardiac Events: death from any cause, myocardial infarction, need for revascularization) and the occurrence of stent thrombosis during hospitalization.
within one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Local/2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings