Bone Healing at Non-submerged Implants Installed With Different Insertion Torques.
Bone Healing at Non-submerged Implants Installed With Different Insertion Torques. A Split Mouth Histomorphometric Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cartagena
-
Cartagena de Indias, Cartagena, Colombia, 5710
- Colombia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of at least two edentulous zone in the posterior segment of the mandible
- ≥ 25 years of age
- smoking ≤ 10 cigarettes per day
- Good general health
- No contraindication for oral surgical procedures.
- Not being pregnant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of systemic disorders
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy;
- Smokers >10 cigarettes per day
- Previous bone augmentation procedures in the region
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Test site (torque of <10 Ncm)
The test sites (<10 Ncm) will be over-prepared with drills of larger diameter
|
All site preparations will be performed deeper compared to the length of the implant so that the implant apex cannot reach the bottom of the osteotomy.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Control site (torque of ~30 Ncm)
the standard sites (~30 Ncm)will be prepared with the corresponding drills suggested by the manufacturer
|
All site preparations will be performed deeper compared to the length of the implant so that the implant apex cannot reach the bottom of the osteotomy.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
New bone in contact with the implant surface
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of healing
|
The percentages of new bone will be evaluated both in contact with the implant surface
|
After 8 weeks of healing
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bone density around the implant surface
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of healing
|
The total mineralized bone will be assessed as sum of new and old bone
|
After 8 weeks of healing
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissue (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants, and marrow spaces (soft tissue)
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of healing
|
The percentages of pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissue (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants, and marrow spaces (soft tissue) will be evaluated all in contact with the implant surface
|
After 8 weeks of healing
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):837-49.
- Cesaretti G, Botticelli D, Renzi A, Rossi M, Rossi R, Lang NP. Radiographic evaluation of immediately loaded implants supporting 2-3 units fixed bridges in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/clr.12565. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
- Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, Papaspyridakos P, Schimmel M, Schrott A, Weber HP. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:287-90. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2013.g4. No abstract available.
- Pantani F, Botticelli D, Garcia IR Jr, Salata LA, Borges GJ, Lang NP. Influence of lateral pressure to the implant bed on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Nov;21(11):1264-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01941.x.
- Rea M, Lang NP, Ricci S, Mintrone F, Gonzalez Gonzalez G, Botticelli D. Healing of implants installed in over- or under-prepared sites--an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):442-446. doi: 10.1111/clr.12390. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
- Rea M, Botticelli D, Ricci S, Soldini C, Gonzalez GG, Lang NP. Influence of immediate loading on healing of implants installed with different insertion torques--an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):90-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12305. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
- Barone A, Alfonsi F, Derchi G, Tonelli P, Toti P, Marchionni S, Covani U. The Effect of Insertion Torque on the Clinical Outcome of Single Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):588-600. doi: 10.1111/cid.12337. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
- Verardi S, Swoboda J, Rebaudi F, Rebaudi A. Osteointegration of Tissue-Level Implants With Very Low Insertion Torque in Soft Bone: A Clinical Study on SLA Surface Treatment. Implant Dent. 2018 Feb;27(1):5-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000714.
- Verrastro Neto A, Andrade R, Correa MG, Casarin RCV, Casati MZ, Pimentel SP, Ribeiro FV, Cirano FR. The impact of different torques for the insertion of immediately loaded implants on the peri-implant levels of angiogenesis- and bone-related markers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 May;47(5):651-657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
- Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, Jacobs R, Naert I. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Aug;21(8):877-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
- Duyck J, Roesems R, Cardoso MV, Ogawa T, De Villa Camargos G, Vandamme K. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):191-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12316. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
- Muktadar AK, Gangaiah M, Chrcanovic BR, Chowdhary R. Evaluation of the effect of self-cutting and nonself-cutting thread designed implant with different thread depth on variable insertion torques: An histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):507-514. doi: 10.1111/cid.12611. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
- Berardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, Rutjes AW, Caputi S. The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses. Implant Dent. 2016 Aug;25(4):532-40. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000422.
- Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):467-71.
- Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
- Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):293-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12475. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
- Ferri M, Lang NP, Angarita Alfonso EE, Bedoya Quintero ID, Burgos EM, Botticelli D. Use of sonic instruments for implant biopsy retrieval. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1237-43. doi: 10.1111/clr.12466. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Amari Y, Piattelli A, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Mesa NF, Ferri M, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. Bone healing at non-submerged implants installed with different insertion torques: a split-mouth histomorphometric randomized controlled trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Dec 5;5(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0194-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- protocol #04-2014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.