Assessing the Wear Rates of the ADM/MDM Hips Using 3D X-ray Analysis
Assessing the Wear Rates of the ADM/MDM Dual Mobility Hips Manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics Using 3D X-ray Analysis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Kerry Ann K. Griffith-Cunningham
- Phone Number: 2273 416 864-6060
- Email: griffithk@smh.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
- Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or non-pregnant female
- Skeletally mature
- 18 to 75 years old
- Stryker Dual Mobility Hip prosthesis
- BMI between 20 and 35
- Follow-up x-rays between 3 years and 6 years postop
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dual Mobility Hip implant that is not the ADM or MDM
- BMI that is 19 or less
- BMI that is greater than 36
- Most recent x-rays less than 3 years postop
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: ADM/MDM hip prosthesis
Type of prosthesis participant received.
|
Dual Mobility Hip prosthesis manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics: ADM/MDM
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To assess the change in polyethylene wear of Dual Mobility hip implants using Stryker Orthopaedics ADM & MDM prostheses
Time Frame: before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken up to 5 years postop.
|
This study will assess the change in linear and volumetric wear using 3D x-ray analysis.
Measurements will be taken of x-rays obtained before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken more than 3 years postop.
|
before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken up to 5 years postop.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To review the number of postop hip dislocations/hip instabilities
Time Frame: first 5 years post surgery
|
Dislocations and the post op time for each occurrence per patient will be collected in tabular format.
This in turn will be used to calculate percent of cases/subject.
|
first 5 years post surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amit Atrey, MD, Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801. No abstract available.
- Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;11(2):89-99. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003.
- Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78.
- Goel A, Lau EC, Ong KL, Berry DJ, Malkani AL. Dislocation rates following primary total hip arthroplasty have plateaued in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):743-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
- Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
- Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela KT. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):342-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810518. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
- Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop. 2009 Aug;33(4):927-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
- Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
- De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1. Erratum In: Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):702-704.
- Harwin SF, Sultan AA, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Piuzzi NS, Mont MA. Mid-Term Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1494-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
- Loving L, Lee RK, Herrera L, Essner AP, Nevelos JE. Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.011. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
- D'Apuzzo MR, Koch CN, Esposito CI, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Assessment of Damage on a Dual Mobility Acetabular System. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1828-35. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-061
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.