De-implementation of Low-value Pharmacological Prescriptions (De-imFAR)

February 7, 2025 updated by: Alvaro Sanchez Perez, Basque Health Service

The De-imFAR study is a two phase study that aims to carry out and test a structured, evidence-based and theory informed process involving the main stakeholders (managers, professionals, patients and researches) for the design, deployment, and evaluation of targeted de-implementation strategies for reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). Specifically, the targeted low-value practice of the DE-imFAR study is the pharmacological prescription of statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in low-risk patients. In order to prevent CVD, one of the leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide, there is general agreement on the indication of lipid-lowering treatment, mainly with statins, in patients with a cardiovascular risk (CVR) measurement greater than 10% over 10 years or in secondary prevention. Whereas, for primary prevention in patients with low CVR (<10%), preventive activities should be focused on the promotion of healthy lifestyles through optimizing diet, increasing physical activity, and stopping smoking.

Aims

  1. Phase I: To design and model in a collegiate way among the agents involved (professionals, patients, managers and researchers) de-implementation strategies to favour the reduction and / or abandonment of low-value prescription of lipid-lowering drugs in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This strategy will be designed using systematic, comprehensive frameworks based on theory and evidence for the design of implementation strategies - the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW), focused on addressing the main determinants (barriers and facilitators) of clinical practice of primary prevention of CVD and adapted to the specific context of primary care in Osakidetza-Basque Health System
  2. Phase II: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of several de-implementation strategies derived from the systematic process of identification of determinants and mapping of adapted intervention strategies with the TDF/BCW frameworks: a strategy based on providing evidence-based information communication technology tools to help and guide decision-making (a non-reflective decision assistance strategy); a decision information strategy based on the dissemination of the evidence concerning CVD primary prevention framed in a corporate campaign encouraging family physicians to move away from PIP (a both reflective and non-reflective decision information strategy) ; and a reflective decision structure strategy encouraging reflection on actual performance based on an audit/feedback system (A reflective decision structure strategy).

Hypothesis Professionals exposed to the de-implementation strategies derived from the systematic process of identification of determinants and mapping of adapted intervention strategies with the TDF/BCW frameworks, will be effective in reducing and/or abandoning the prescription of statins in primary prevention of CVD. Among the evaluated de-implementation strategies, those that encourage self-reflection on actual performance will obtain the largest effects as compared to non-reflective strategies.

Design Phase I formative research to design and model de-implementation strategies and Phase II effectiveness and feasibility evaluation through a cluster randomized implementation trial with an additional control group. Phase I formative research will include the following actions: Cross-sectional observational study of low value pharmacological prescription in the primary prevention of CVD; Literature review on the determinants of low value pharmacological prescription behaviour and effective intervention strategies; Qualitative study on the determinants of low value pharmacological prescription in primary prevention of CVD; Collegiate mapping of the de-implementation strategies; Selection of de-implementation strategies based in perceived effectiveness and feasibility. During Phase II, the evaluation of several de-implementation strategies produced through the phase I formative evaluation will be conducted. A mixed method evaluation will be used: quantitative for assessing the implementation results at the professional level and qualitative for assessing the feasibility and perceived impact of the de-implementation strategies from the family physicians' (FPs) perspective and the experience and satisfaction of patients concerning the clinical care received.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
348

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Bizkaia
      • Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain, 48014
        • Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Eligibility for professionals:

  • FPs belonging to any of the 13 Integrated Healthcare Organizations of Osakidetza
  • Non-zero annual incidence rate of PIP of statins at baseline (2021)
  • A minimum cluster size of n ≥10 patients

Eligibility for patients:

  • 40- to 74-year-old men and 45- to 74-year-old women
  • No history of statin use
  • LDL cholesterol levels between 70 and 189 mg/dL and/or TC between 200 and 289 mg/dL
  • Without ischemic heart disease/CVD
  • Estimated CVR REGICOR <7.5%
  • Attend at least one appointment at the participating FPs' practices during the study period from May 2022 to May 2023, and followed until May 2024

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Non-reflective decision assistance strategy
The decision support tools integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) for the non-reflective decision assistance strategy will be applied to all FPs from the 13 Integrated Healthcare Organizations (IHOs) of Osakidetza- Basque Health Service
Behavioral: A non-reflective decision assistance strategy
A strategy based on providing evidence-based information communication technology tools to help and guide decision-making: pop-up reminders and alerts with associated messages incorporated into the REGICOR CVR calculator in OSABIDE (Osakidetza's EHR system) and within the prescription pathway in PRESBIDE (the electronic drug prescribing component).
Experimental: Reflective and non-reflective decision information strategy in addition to the previous arm
At least 58 FPs from two IHOs (Barakaldo-Sestao and Ezkerraldea-Enkarterri-Cruces) will be randomly assigned to this experimental arm (decision assistance strategy + decision information strategy)
Behavioral: A non-reflective decision assistance strategy
A strategy based on providing evidence-based information communication technology tools to help and guide decision-making: pop-up reminders and alerts with associated messages incorporated into the REGICOR CVR calculator in OSABIDE (Osakidetza's EHR system) and within the prescription pathway in PRESBIDE (the electronic drug prescribing component).
Behavioral: A both reflective and non-reflective decision information strategy
This strategy consists of a corporate campaign entitled "Stopping Low-Value Prescribing" run by the organization (Osakidetza- Basque Health Service) that provides FPs with the evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the primary prevention of CVD in low-risk patients.
Experimental: A reflective decision structure strategy in addition to the previous arm
At least other 58 FPs from two IHOs (Barakaldo-Sestao and Ezkerraldea-Enkarterri-Cruces) will be randomly assigned to this experimental arm (decision assistance strategy + decision information strategy + decision structure strategy)
Behavioral: A non-reflective decision assistance strategy
A strategy based on providing evidence-based information communication technology tools to help and guide decision-making: pop-up reminders and alerts with associated messages incorporated into the REGICOR CVR calculator in OSABIDE (Osakidetza's EHR system) and within the prescription pathway in PRESBIDE (the electronic drug prescribing component).
Behavioral: A both reflective and non-reflective decision information strategy
This strategy consists of a corporate campaign entitled "Stopping Low-Value Prescribing" run by the organization (Osakidetza- Basque Health Service) that provides FPs with the evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the primary prevention of CVD in low-risk patients.
Behavioral: A reflective decision structure strategy
The strategy involves the sending of regular audit/feedback reports with practice- and organizational-level performance indicators regarding PIP of statins and healthy lifestyle promotion to prompt reflection about their own care practice, provided along with intention formation and goal-setting-focused messages.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
De-implementation strategies effectiveness: incidence of the PIP of statins
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months and 24 months
Change in the incidence of the PIP of statins recorded in the EHR in the target population.
from baseline to 12 months and 24 months
De-implementation strategies effectiveness: incidence of the provision of advice regarding healthy lifestyles promotion activities
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months and 24 months
Change in the incidence of the provision of advice regarding healthy lifestyles promotion activities recorded in the EHR in the target population.
from baseline to 12 months and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach of recommendations for CVD primary prevention
Time Frame: 12 months
Absolute number and percentage of patients in the target population who received the recommended CVD primary prevention clinical intervention.
12 months
De-implementation strategies secondary effectiveness: incidence of CVR (REGICOR)
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Change in the incidence of CVR (REGICOR) recorded in the EHR in the target population.
from baseline to 12 months
FP's adoption: degree to which the recommended CVD primary prevention clinical intervention is adopted by the FPs
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of FPs who reduce PIP of statins and/or increase health promotion activities recorded in the EHR in the target population.
12 months
Strategies implementation fidelity
Time Frame: 12 months
Process indicators of the delivery of and exposure to the de-implementation strategies (percentage of FPs exposed to the strategies compared)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Basque Health Service

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Carlos III Health Institute
European Union
Health Department of the Basque Government

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018111085 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Health Department of the Basque Government)
  • 2021111024 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Health Department of the Basque Government)
  • PI21/00025 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and European Union (European Regional Development Fund "A way to make Europe"))
  • RD16/0007/0002 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and European Union (European Regional Development Fund "A way to make Europe"))
  • RD21/0016/0003 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and European Union (NextGenerationEU funds, MRR))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will be shared that underlie results reported in the publication, after deidentification

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 6 months after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Since data supporting the present study will mostly concern routine data retrieved from the electronic health record of the Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, it will be only shared on justified request to the study guarantors (proposals should be directed to the Responsible Party). It will only be shared with researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implementation Science

Clinical Trials on A non-reflective decision assistance strategy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings