Effect of Preoperative Immunonutrition in Upper Digestive Tract

August 19, 2019 updated by: Alfonso Vidal Casariego, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Preoperative Immunonutrition Versus Standard Enteral Nutrition in Elective Oncological Surgery of the Upper Digestive Tract

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial that will evaluate the effects of immuno-nutrition in the preoperative period in patients with cancer of the upper digestive tract (esophagus, stomach, and pancreas). The aim is to compare the specific effect of the immunonutrients respect to an equivalent formula in caloric-protein value but without immunonutrients, in the surgical evolution of the cancer patient.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

Perioperative nutritional status is a key factor in the evolution, as well as, postoperative morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Particularly, digestive neoplasms have a high risk of malnutrition and this is related to a higher rate of surgery complications and mortality in the postoperative period. The immunonutrition seems to modulate the immune system and the inflammatory response in patients operated on for digestive neoplasia. However, the results to date are controversial.

Aim:

To compare the effect of an immunomodulatory oral nutritional supplement (enriched in arginine, nucleotides, omega 3 fatty acids, olive oil polyphenols, L-carnitine, and antioxidants) against an equivalent in protein-energy without immunonutrients, administrated in the preoperative period, in the surgical evolution of the cancer patient with neoplasia of the upper digestive tract.

Methods:

It is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. 178 patients with neoplasms of the esophagus, stomach or pancreas, with indication of surgical treatment, will be included. The patients will be randomized into two groups (intervention group and control group) and both will receive 2 daily bricks of the assigned formula (with or without immunonutrients, respectively) 5 days prior to surgery. The main variables of the study are: appearance of infectious or noninfectious complications in the postoperative period, length of hospital stay, and mortality. These variables will be compared by group (immunonutrition vs. non immunonutrition).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
178

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • A Coruña
      • Santiago De Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15701
        • Recruiting
        • Miguel A. Martínez Olmos
        • Contact:
          • Miguel A Martínez Olmos, MD PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Miguel A Martínez Olmos, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ana Cantón Blanco, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rocío Villar Taibo, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alicia Santamaría Nieto, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ana B Crujeiras, BSc PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ana Suárez Rodríguez, BSc
    • La Coruna
      • A Coruña, La Coruna, Spain, 15006
        • Recruiting
        • Alfonso Vidal-Casariego
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alfonso Vidal-Casariego, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francisco Pita-Gutiérrez, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gloria Lugo-Rodríguez, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cancer of esophagus, stomach and / or pancreas, at any stage, proposed for surgery
  • Signing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Advanced renal insufficiency prior to dialysis (GFR <25 ml / min)
  • Allergy or intolerance to any of the components of the dietary supplement (including fish allergy)
  • Patients with contraindications for enteral nutrition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immunonutrition
Oral nutritional supplement: hypercaloric and hyperproteic with immunonutrients: Arginine, nucleotides, omega-3, olive oil polyphenols, antioxidants and L-carnitine
Dietary supplement: Immunonutrition
It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated with immunonutrients: Arginin, nucleotides, omega-3, olive oil polyphenols, antioxidants and L-carnitine
Other Names:
  • Bi1 procare
Placebo Comparator: Standard
Oral nutritional supplement: hypercaloric and hyperproteic without immunonutrients
Dietary supplement: Standard
It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated without immunonutrients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Infectious complications
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operative
Up to 30 days post-operative
Surgical fistulas
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operative
Up to 30 days post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operative
Up to 30 days post-operative
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operative
Up to 30 days post-operative
Weight loss
Time Frame: 10 days Pre-operative
10 days Pre-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Miguel Á Martínez-Olmos, PhD, MD, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario De Santiago
  • Principal Investigator: Alfonso Vidal-Casariego, PhD, MD, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 10, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018/548

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Immunonutrition

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings