A Multicenter, Open-Label Retreatment Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of PN40082 for Lip Augmentation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Encinitas, California, United States, 92024
- California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33144
- International Dermatology Research, INC
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
- Skin Specialists, PC
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10022
- Schweiger Dermatology, PLLC
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37215
- Tennessee Clinical Research Center
-
-
Texas
-
Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
- Skintastic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- In Protocol PRO 2018-02, the subject was in the per-protocol population, i.e., met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation.
- If female and of childbearing potential, a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1/Day 1 and the subject agrees to use adequate contraception during the study period
- Willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: PN40082
All subjects in this study will receive one open-label treatment with PN40082.
|
PN40082 (manufactured by Prollenium Medical Technologies) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes with 25 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Lip Fullness Grading Scale
Time Frame: Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 Days
|
Lip Fullness Grading Scale is a validated 5-point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) up to 4 full lips (best outcome)
|
Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 Days
|
|
Change From Baseline in Perioral Lines Severity Scale
Time Frame: Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 Days
|
Change from baseline in the perioral lines rating scale (POL), a 4 point rating scale with 0 as a mouth with no perioral lines (better outcome) to 3 a mouth with many deep lines or crevices (worse outcome).
|
Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 Days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement
Time Frame: Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
Change from baseline for the patient Global Aesthetic Improvement scale, a 5 point scale with 1= the appearance is worse than the original condition (worse outcome) up to 5 very much improved optimal cosmetic result (better outcome)
|
Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement
Time Frame: Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
Change from baseline in the Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement score, a 5 point scale with 1= the appearance is worse than the original condition (worse outcome) up to 5 = very much improved optimal cosmetic result (better outcome)
|
Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
|
Number of Subjects With Decreased Swelling
Time Frame: Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
Swelling Assessment at Visit 3/Month 2, a 4 point scale with 0 = no swelling (better outcome) up to 4= Severe Swelling (worse outcome)
|
Visit 1/Day 1 to Visit 3/Month 2, 56 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stacy R. Smith, MD, California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRO 2018-03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.