A Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing Cost Effectiveness on Two Commercially Available Gastric Feeding Tubes
A Single-Center, Investigator-Initiated, Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing Cost Effectiveness Two Commercially Available Gastric Feeding Tubes (Capsule Dome G-Tube Versus Balloon Bolus Feeding Tube).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Gastrostomy tubes are enteral feeding devices that are designed to provide delivery of nutrients, fluids, medications directly into the stomach, bypassing the mouth and esophagus. These devices are also known as gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG tube). These are used when patients have conditions that make them unable to swallow. While parenteral (Intravenous) nutrition and nasogastric tubes are also nutritional-support methods. A variety of g-tube designs have been used in pediatric to adult populations. The insertion of a g-tube is one of the most common endoscopic procedures and is relatively safe. The OSU endoscopy lab placed 381 g-tubes in 2018.
The most common G-tube used by the OSU Endoscopy Lab is the Balloon Bolus feeding tube. In 2017 the Capsule Dome G-Tube became commercially available. The cost of the Capsule dome g-tube is twice as expensive as the standard balloon g-tube. The insertion costs would be comparable.
The need to perform a pilot comparative study of the two g-tubes is necessary to improve our physicians understanding of the potential cost-effectiveness that longer patency we could gather from the alternative device.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
- Endoscopy Doan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed an IRB-approved informed consent form for the study.
- Adults (18-75 years of age)
- Requirement of long term enteral tube feeding (> to 12 months) and are due for a change of their initial or prior replacement bolus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube.
- Ability to consent for the procedure and study.
- Subjects must be able to communicate in english via telephone and understand the assessment checklists.
- Expected to survive 12 months. Exclusion Criteria
The following subjects will not be eligible for inclusion in the study:
- Enteral feeding is not necessary for at least 12 months,
- A medical condition that makes it impossible for them to communicate via telephone
- Subjects requiring feeding into the jejunum via a combined gastroenterostomy-jejunostomy tube
- Subjects who require endoscopic replacement of their current gastrostomy tube.
- Impaired cognition, inability to provide assessment feedback by telephone.
- Subjects not expected to survive > 12 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Capsule Dome G-Tube
|
Feeding replacement tubes with two different FDA approved devices in forty subjects
|
|
Active Comparator: Balloon Bolus feeding tube
|
Feeding replacement tubes with two different FDA approved devices in forty subjects
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of PEG tube device longevity
Time Frame: Up to twelve months
|
Time (metric is looking at Q3 month follow-up for one year)
|
Up to twelve months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measure the cost difference of two PEG tube devices
Time Frame: Up to twelve months
|
Metrics evaluated using a cost-effectiveness analysis
|
Up to twelve months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffery R Groce, MD, Ohio State University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- New-41476
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Long Term Enteral Tube Feeding
-
NCT02006953TerminatedEnteral Nutrition | Enteral Feeding | Gastrostomy Tube
-
NCT07570537Not yet recruitingEnteral Nutrition | Tube Feeding | Clogged Enteral Access Devices | Occluded Enteral Access Devices | Enteral Access Device | Gastric Feeding Tubes
-
NCT03262493CompletedEnteral Nutrition | Adult | Tube Feeding
-
NCT02430571CompletedEnteral Nutrition, Feeding Tube Placement
-
NCT03497091CompletedEnteral Feeding Intolerance | Children Requiring Amino Acid-based Formula Tube Feeding
-
NCT07441746Not yet recruitingEnteral Nutrition | Clinical Implementation | Standardized Tube Feeding Care
-
NCT06161350Enrolling by invitationEnteral Nutrition | Parenteral Nutrition | Tube Feeding | Oral Aversion
-
NCT04247269WithdrawnEnteral Feeding Intolerance | Tube Feeding | Nutrition Disorder, Child
-
NCT07044492Active, not recruitingLong-Term Care | Long-term Care Facility
-
NCT07036081CompletedGastrostomy Tube | Enteral Feeds | Enteral Nutrition (Food for Special Medical Purposes) | Enteral Tube Nutrition
Clinical Trials on Capsule Dome G-Tube
-
NCT02675673WithdrawnEnteral Feeding for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
-
NCT03099824Completed
-
NCT01868412CompletedWound Infection | Wound Healing
-
NCT02445794CompletedFriedreich's Ataxia
-
NCT01184027WithdrawnHead and Neck Cancer | Surgery | Nutrition | Swallowing
-
NCT02380794CompletedPeripheral Arterial Disease | Intermittent Claudication
-
NCT07431268Completed