METEOR Think NIV Pilot
Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research: Think NIV Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- UPMC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Two study populations will be included.
Learners (population 1) will include:
- frontline care providers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and respiratory therapists
- working in a participating ICU.
Frontline care providers will be excluded if they:
- have not worked in their current UPMC ICU for more than one month prior to the current study
- have not directly cared for a mechanically ventilated patient in a UPMC ICU during the three months preceding the current study.
Patients (population 2) will include:
- mechanically ventilated patients
- treated in the participating ICUs
- surviving to extubation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional online continuing education
|
30-minute, online, interactive, educational video describing the benefits of preventive post-extubation NIV, the indications and contraindications for preventive post-extubation NIV, and the value of working together as an interprofessional ICU team when implementing preventive post-extubation NIV
|
|
Active Comparator: Interprofessional education
|
One-time, 90-120-minute, in-person, interprofessional educational workshop consisting of a 30-minute didactic session and a 60-90-minute small group session
|
|
Active Comparator: Just-in-time education
|
"Just-in-time," point-of-care education provided by trained advanced practice providers who will be on-hand in the study ICU, where they will deliver the education at the bedside during rounds when a patient meets criteria for preventive post-extubation NIV
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of ICU Team Members (Learners) Who Received Education
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
|
This implementation outcome measuring reach only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 1 month
|
|
Learner Attitudes Regarding Education (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "I liked the way the information was presented."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of High-risk Patients Without Contraindications Who Received Post-extubation Noninvasive Ventilation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their hospital admission, estimated to be 1-2 weeks
|
This implementation outcome only applies to patient participants.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of their hospital admission, estimated to be 1-2 weeks
|
|
Learner Role Clarity (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "In assessing mechanically ventilated patients for potential extubation, I know what my responsibilities are."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
|
Learner Specialization (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "In assessing mechanically ventilated patients for potential extubation, I have knowledge that no other team member has."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
|
Learner Credibility (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "In making decisions about extubation, I am comfortable accepting procedural suggestions from other team members."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
|
Learner Coordination (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "In delivering care to patients in respiratory failure, our ICU team works together in a well-coordinated fashion."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
|
Learner Psychological Safety (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "I'm confident that when I make suggestions, other members of the care team will listen."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
|
Learner Perspectives on Leader Inclusiveness (Mean Scores on Relevant Survey Questions)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
|
Using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), learners reported their level of agreement with the statement "From now on, physicians in this ICU are likely to strike an appropriate balance between authority and openness to suggestion."
This outcome only applies to learner participants.
|
Up to 10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy D Girard, MD, MSCI, University of Pittsburgh
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ouellette DR, Patel S, Girard TD, Morris PE, Schmidt GA, Truwit JD, Alhazzani W, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Kress JP. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
- Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug.
- Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2612-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a.
- Ferrer M, Sellares J, Valencia M, Carrillo A, Gonzalez G, Badia JR, Nicolas JM, Torres A. Non-invasive ventilation after extubation in hypercapnic patients with chronic respiratory disorders: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61038-2. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY19050064
- U01HL143507 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.