LEft VEntricuLar Activation Time Shortening With Physiological Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy (LEVEL-AT)

August 3, 2022 updated by: Josep Lluis Mont Girbau

LEft VEntricuLar Activation Time Shortening With Physiological Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy: a Randomized Study (LEVEL-AT)

The LEVEL-AT Trial (LEft VEntricuLar Activation Time Shortening with Physiological Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization therapy: a randomized study) is a non-inferiority study that aims to determine if physiological pacing could decrease the left ventricular activation time compared with biventricular therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To date studies have showed that physiological pacing could get similar clinical and echocardiographic response to that obtained with biventricular therapy. Activation time shortening with permanent physiological pacing has not been studied.

This study will randomize 70 patients to a strategy of: biventricular pacing versus physiological pacing.

LEVEL-AT study will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: shortening of the QRS, activation time with electrocardiographic imaging, echocardiographic asynchrony and ventricular function and clinical parameters (NYHA functional class, mortality and heart failure hospitalization).

Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic imaging follow-up will be performed for 1 year.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Select
      • Barcelona, Select, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document.
  • The patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Left bundle branch block, QRS ≥130 and FEVI <=35% (Indication of cardiac resynchronization IA or IB ESC Guidelines). No indication of stimulation for AV block.
  • Patients with indication of resynchronization therapy for ventricular dysfunction and indication of cardiac stimulation for AV block according to ESC Guidelines (IA ESC Guidelines).
  • Non-left bundle branch block, QRS ≥150 and FEVI <=35% (Indication of cardiac resynchronization IIaB ESC Guidelines).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization during the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Physiological pacing

Pacing the his-purkinje system.

Crossover to biventricular CRT will be allowed in the following situations: failed physiological pacing lead implantation; high thresholds (>3.5V / 1ms); no shortening of QRS (shortening <20%) or failure to meet non-selective HBP criteria [Europace. 2019 Oct 9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz275].
Device: Lead placed in the His-Purkinje system in order to achieve QRS shortening.
Physiologic pacing to achieve QRS shortening. If the patient has indication of stimulation (AV block), a backup lead will be implanted in the right ventricle. All patients will have a lead placed in the right atrium (except those that have permanent atrial fibrillation).
Active Comparator: Biventricular resynchronization therapy

Pacing from the right ventricular and coronary sinus leads. Electrocardiographic optimization with fusion-optimized intervals.

Crossover from biventricular CRT to physiological pacing will be allowed in the following situations: coronary sinus cannot be cannulated; no lateral or posterolateral branches; or phrenic stimulation.
Device: Lead is placed in a tributary of the coronary sinus.
Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy is the use of a pacemaker with two endocardial leads placed in the right atrium and right ventricle. The third lead is placed in a tributary of the coronary sinus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular activation time.
Time Frame: 45 days
Left ventricular activation time measured by eletrocardiographic imaging.
45 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QRS duration.
Time Frame: Implant, 6 months and 12 months.
QRS duration (milliseconds) measured with a 12-lead ECG.
Implant, 6 months and 12 months.
Left ventricular activation time.
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months.
Left ventricular activation time measured by eletrocardiographic imaging
6 months and 12 months.
Change in left ventricular function.
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months.
Left ventricular ejection fraction measured with Simpson method with echocardiography.
6 months and 12 months.
Change in end-systolic volume.
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months.
End-systolic volume measured with echocardiography.
6 months and 12 months.
Change in NYHA functional class.
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months.
NYHA functional class I, II, III, IV.
6 months and 12 months.
Hospitalization due to heart failure or mortality (combined endpoint).
Time Frame: 1 year.
Hospitalization: patient hospitalization (yes/no) Mortality: mortality (yes/no)
1 year.
Correction of septal flash
Time Frame: 15 days
Correction of septal flash determined with echocardiography (M mode)
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Josep Lluis Mont Girbau

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jose M Tolosana, MD, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Margarida Pujol Lopez, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Study Director: Lluis Mont Girbau, MD, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LEVEL-AT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings