Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation (ERDAF)

August 12, 2019 updated by: Konstantinos Tsioufis, Hippocration General Hospital

The purpose of the ERDAF study (Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation) is to evaluate the renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation(AF) in order to show if there is a reduction in the AF-related symptoms, the AF recurrence rate, and the total burden (symptomatic and/or asymptomatic) of the arrhythmia. To the best of our knowledge, ERDAF is the first randomized study, which is going to evaluate the effect of RDN [without pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)] on AF recurrence profile and AF ''burden'' using continuous long-term rhythm monitoring via ILRs for a period of 18 months.

Hypothesis

Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation reduces AF recurrences, total AF "burden" (asymptomatic / symptomatic) and limits the AF-related symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In arterial hypertension (AH), a significant proportion of patients, despite the optimal medical therapy, do not achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) control (resistant hypertension). Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel alternative minimally invasive therapeutic option for patients with resistant AH. Recent data has shown that RDN with or without pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may also have a positive impact on the management of patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no randomized study, to date, suggesting that RDN itself (without PVI) reduces the AF recurrences, symptoms, and the total burden of the arrhythmia. The purpose of this study [Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation (ERDAF)] is to evaluate the RDN (without PVI) in patients with resistant AH and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF in order to show if there is benefit in the incidence of AF recurrences, the total AF burden (symptomatic and asymptomatic) as well as the BP control. This is a single-center, randomized study in which thirty (30) patients with resistant AH and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF will be randomized (1:1) after sinus rhythm restoration and implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR), in either RDN (n=15) or conventional treatment of resistant AH with optimal drug therapy (n=15). Patients will be followed-up every three months and for a period of 18 months after the implantation of the ILR. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period). The primary endpoint will be the change in the total AF burden (Total time in AF during the follow-up period). Secondary endpoints will include the change in the symptomatic and asymptomatic burden of AF, the time to detect the first AF recurrence (symptomatic and/or asymptomatic)-early recurrence of AF after RDN, and the change in BP during the follow-up period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients >18 years with resistant hypertension [Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg despite treatment with ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs of various classes, including a diuretic) and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF will be included in the study after sinus rhythm restoration

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with permanent AF or patients with long-standing persistent AF as defined by the current ESC guidelines for the management of AF1.
  2. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] <45 ml / min / 1.73 m2 calculated using the CKD-EPI43.
  3. Patients with secondary arterial hypertension.
  4. Patients with an established diagnosis of resistant hypertension <6 months.
  5. Patients with severe renal artery stenosis or previous renal artery angioplasty.
  6. Patients who have undergone or are about to undergo pulmonary vein isolation.
  7. Patients with left end-diastolic ventricle diameter >60 mm in men or >55mm in women.
  8. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% in the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
  9. Patients with AF possible reversible causes (pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndromes, thyrotoxicosis, alcohol abuse, etc.)
  10. Patients with heart failure in NYHA III-IV stage.
  11. Patients with life expectancy <1 year.
  12. Pregnant women.
  13. Patients who are unable to give consent to participate in the study.
  14. Patients who do not wish to give written consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sympathetic Renal Denervation
Procedure: Sympathetic Renal Denervation
Catheter-based sympathetic renal denervation (RDN) using radiofrequency, ultrasound, or perivascular injection of neurotoxic agents such as alcohol has been introduced as a minimally invasive alternative treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension. RDN consists of endovascular catalysis of the kidney sympathetic nerves running in the wall of the renal arteries.
Device: Implantable Loop Recorder
Implantable Loop Recorders (ILRs) are small, subcutaneously implanted devices that are able to detect and store atrial fibrillation episodes lasting longer than 2 minutes with high sensitivity (96.1-100%) and good specificity (67-85.4%) for a period of up to three years.
Other Names:
  • Insertable Cardiac Monitor
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment with drug therapy
Conventional drug therapy of resistant hypertension
Device: Implantable Loop Recorder
Implantable Loop Recorders (ILRs) are small, subcutaneously implanted devices that are able to detect and store atrial fibrillation episodes lasting longer than 2 minutes with high sensitivity (96.1-100%) and good specificity (67-85.4%) for a period of up to three years.
Other Names:
  • Insertable Cardiac Monitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in the total AF "burden" (symptomatic and asymptomatic AF burden) during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months.The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
AF "burden": The amount of time (minutes or hours) the patient is in AF out of the total follow-up period.
From 3 months to 18 months.The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the symptomatic AF "burden" during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 month.The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
Symptomatic AF ''burden'': The amount of time (minutes or hours) in which the patient is in AF, perceived by the patient AF, out of the total follow-up period.
From 3 months to 18 month.The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
Change in asymptomatic AF "burden" during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
Asymptomatic AF "burden": The amount of time (minutes or hours) in which the patient is in AF that the patient does not perceive out of the total follow-up period.
From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
The time interval for the detection of the first AF recurrence after the ILR implantation during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
The time interval for detection of the first symptomatic recurrence of the arrhythmia after the ILR implantation during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
Change in blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure) as measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
Change in office blood pressure (systolic, diastolic).
Time Frame: From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)
From 3 months to 18 months. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hippocration General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Constantinos P Tsioufis, MD, PhD, First Cardiology Deparment, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Principal Investigator: Panteleimon E Papakonstantinou, MD, PhD, First Cardiology Deparment, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ERDAF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Sympathetic Renal Denervation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings