Lumbopelvic Biomechanical Variables and TMJ Kinematics Changes in Pregnant Women: A Case-Control Study
The relationship between the pelvis and stomatognathic system:
Various rationales for the relationship between the spine or pelvis and TMJ have been found. These theories include fascial, myological interrelationships, referred pain patterns and facilitating tonic neck reflexes involving inter segmental spinal pathways. A contributing mechanism could be the relationship between how TMJ occlusion, head position and body posture relate to the body's natural neurological visual/vestibular righting mechanism (Blum, 2004).
There is a Correlation between the facial axis together with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, the inner gonial angle and the mandibular plane with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, as well as the facial depth with the pelvic inclination showed a significant correlation (Carsten et al., 2007).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 12651
- Rovan Elbesh
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
30 women will participate in this study, thirty women diagnosed as having cyclic pelvic pain and thirty women diagnosed as having non cyclic pelvic pain thirty women normal women will not having pelvic pain. They will be selected from outpatient clinic of obstetrics and Gynaecology department in El-Hosary family health Centre.
All participants will be given a full explanation of the protocol of the study and informed consent form will be signed from each subject before participating in the study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The age of the participants will be ranged from 20 to 40 years. Their body mass index will be ranged from 20 to 25 kg/m2. They will have regular menstrual cycle. They will not receive any hormonal therapy or taking any regular drugs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bone disease. Discogenic state with radiculopathy or not. Systemic disease of musculoskeletal system. Any sensory problems. Previous vertebral fractures. Major spinal structural abnormality. Major jaw abnormality. Any jaw orthotics or prosthesis. Missing teeth.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Study group (group A):
Study group (group ) Diagnostic Test: Study group (group A)24 women who have cyclic CPP I) Pelvic tilt angle: The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately while the woman was in standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer |
assesment
|
|
Study group(group B):
included 20 women who have non-cyclic CPP and the other 16 women of the participants were normal I) Pelvic tilt angle: The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately. In contrast, the woman was in a standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer Diagnostic Test: Study group (group A) |
|
|
Control group (group C):
16 women of the participants were normal and considered the control group I) Pelvic tilt angle: The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately while the woman was in standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
body mass index
Time Frame: 3 months
|
BMI in kg/m^2
|
3 months
|
|
Satisfaction assessed by the VAS
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Degrees of menstrual pain will be assessed using a VAS, which was a method of representing subjects' pain on a 10 cm linear scale.
Score of 0 meant 'no pain' and 10 meant 'worst pain'.
Tomeasure specific symptoms, such as the s
|
3 months
|
|
jaw movement
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Maximal vertical mouth opening (MIO): From sitting position, with the use of the calliper, the distance between the incisal edges along the midline of the upper and lower central incisors without pain was measured, by placing one end of the poley gauge against the incisal edge of one of the upper central incisors, and the other end against the incisal edge of the opposing lower incisor. The distance recorded in millimeters, the subjects was instructed to" open your mouth as wide as possible without causing pain or discomfort". The poley gauge was sterilized with antiseptic solution before and after each measure |
3 months
|
|
pelvic tilt in degrees:
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The blocks are released and the rods are placed over the crest of the ilium.
The blocks are then pressed firmly toward the midline.
Read the angle from the level.
If the gauge reads over 21/2°, the result is listed as positive.Anterior pelvic tilting angle: PALM was used for measuring pelvic tilting angle.
A mark was put on a point just inferior to ASIS; another mark was put just inferior to PSIS.
The callipers of the PALM were put on these two points
|
3 months
|
|
Spinal curves Measurement
Time Frame: 3 months
|
spinal inclinations
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P.T.REC/012/001888
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.