Injection of Subcutaneous Glucose 10% in Small Shots is Effective in the Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

May 5, 2020 updated by: mahmoud younis, Ministry of Health and Population, Egypt
Observational cohort prospective study with the following of 100 patients of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 2 groups each group 50 patients, each group 30 males, and 20 females,35 patients with type 2 diabetes and 15 patients type 1 diabetes all have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the second group is considered as control.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Observational cohort prospective study with the following of 100 patients of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 2 groups each group 50 patients, each group 30 males, and 20 females,35 patients with type 2 diabetes and 15 patients type 1 diabetes all have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the second group is considered as control. the ages of all patients are between 20 and 50 years.

The first group was on subcutaneous glucose 0.5 ml per site around subcutaneous nerves in the foot region both on palm and sole.which is repeated every 2 weeks for 2 months.

Pain severity was evaluated by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which is a numerical rating scales, with a straight horizontal line of 100 mm. which is directed from the left with severe pain to the right with no pain. 1-3 = mild pain,4-6 = moderate pain,7-10 = severe pain.

The evaluation of neuropathy was done by using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) after translation to the Arabic language.which consists a 15 self-administered questionnaires and examination lower extremities which comprise inspection and examination of vibratory senses and ankle reflexes. A score which is more than 7 was suggested to be abnormal.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 11759
        • Mahmoud Younis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

100 patients of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 2 groups each group 50 patients, each group 30 males, and 20 females,35 patients with type 2 diabetes and 15 patients type 1 diabetes all have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the second group is considered as control. the ages of all patients are between 20 and 50 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients 20 years to 50 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who have symptoms of symmetrical peripheral neuropathic pain.
  2. female Patients are not pregnant.
  3. Patient has a pain score of at least 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  4. Patients are on their antidiabetes medication.
  5. patents are not on any medication for peripheral neuropathy.
  6. Patient must be able to complete questions on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has conditions that could affect the evaluation of painful DPN, or non-diabetic neurologic disorders.
  2. Patient has skin conditions in the area affected by the neuropathy that could alter sensation.
  3. Patient with history of drug abuse.
  4. patients on any drug for diabetic neuropathy like pregabalin or gabapentin. No side effects were monitored during the period of treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
on subcutaneous glucose
this group was on subcutaneous glucose 0.5 ml per site around subcutaneous nerves in the foot region both on palm and sole.which is repeated every 2 weeks for 2 months.
Drug: GLUCOSE 10%
subcutaneous glucose 0.5 ml per site around subcutaneous nerves
Other Names:
  • dextrose 10%
control(not receiving treatment)
the second group is considered as control.received no treatment.
Drug: GLUCOSE 10%
subcutaneous glucose 0.5 ml per site around subcutaneous nerves
Other Names:
  • dextrose 10%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Injection of subcutaneous glucose 10% in small shots is effective in treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain measured the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: from baseline to 2 months
Pain severity was evaluated by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which is a numerical rating scale, with a straight horizontal line of 100 mm. which is directed from the left with severe pain to the right with no pain. 1-3 = mild pain,4-6 = moderate pain,7-10 = severe pain.
from baseline to 2 months
Injection of subcutaneous glucose 10% in small shots is effective in improving neuropathic signs using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI)
Time Frame: from baseline to 2 months
The evaluation of neuropathy was done by using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) after translation to the Arabic language. Which consists a 15 self-administered questionnaires and examination of lower extremities which comprise inspection and examination of vibratory senses and ankle reflexes. A score which is more than 7 was suggested to be abnormal.
from baseline to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ministry of Health and Population, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • mahmoudyounis

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on GLUCOSE 10%

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings