Laser Treated vs SLA Treated Short Implants in Terms of Stability.
Implant Stability in Laser Treated Surface vs SLA Treated Short Implants (Randomized Clinical Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Adult patients with Edentulous posterior maxillae with insufficient ridge for placement of standard length dental implant, but allowing placement of short 8mm dental implant.
- Males and females.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
- Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
- Psychiatric problems
- Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site
- Patients suffering from immunodeficiency, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
- Intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Laser and SLA implants
Surgical placement of short implants in maxillary posterior teeth with Laser surface treated and SLA surface treated dental implants
|
Patients will be randomized into two groups, control group for SLA implants, and study group will receive the Laser treated implants.
Implants will be placed classically in the posterior maxillary region and their stability will be measured by ISQ device at the placement.
Measurements will be taken again at 2, 4, 6, 8 , 10 and 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of change in implant stability at base line, 2,4,8, 12 weeks
Time Frame: 3 months
|
measuring implant stability with resonance frequency analysis device using implant stability quotation (ISQ) that measures the stiffness and deflection of implant bone complex.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1719
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.