Evaluation of Esthetic Outcomes of M-shaped Flap Implant Uncovering Technique Versus I-shaped Incision Around Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Using Pink Esthetic Score
Evaluation of Esthetic Outcomes of M-flap Implant Uncovering Technique Versus I-shaped Incision Around Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Using Pink Esthetic Score (PES) (RCT)
The aim of this study is to evaluate the soft-tissue profile around a single-tooth implant in the anterior maxilla utilizing the PES after implant uncovering using "M" flap versus I-shaped incision.The primary objective is evaluation of esthetic outcomes around implant using PES.
Hypothesis: The use of I-shaped incision exposure technique will result in better esthetic outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with osseointegrated dental implant in the anterior maxilla.
- Patients of 20 - 50 years
- Periodontally healthy patients.
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
- No systemic condition that contraindicate surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
- Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
- Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
- Psychiatric problems.
- Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional
|
Implant uncovering in the second stage using 3 different exposure techniques
|
|
Active Comparator: I-incision
|
Implant uncovering in the second stage using 3 different exposure techniques
|
|
Active Comparator: M-flap
|
Implant uncovering in the second stage using 3 different exposure techniques
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PES
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Esthetic outcomes around implant
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Ezzat Implant Master Thesis
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.