Determination of Microbiological Factors Associated With Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancers (MICARE)

February 11, 2025 updated by: Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Determination of Microbiological Factors Associated With Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancers: Focus on Cyclomodulin-producing Escherichia Coli

The objective of this project is to determine in a non-invasive manner (fecal samples) the predictive value of the intestinal microbiota and the presence of genotoxin-producing bacteria on the response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. This could lead to a better understanding and selection of patients for personalized treatment in rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rectal cancer is the 8th leading cause of cancer in the world with more than 300,000 deaths in 2018. In addition to surgery, neoadjuvant treatment has proven its value in reducing local recurrences. Evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant treatment (essential for the subsequent therapeutic decision but also for the oncological prognosis. It is based on rectal magnetic resonance imaging, completed after surgery by anatomopathology. A personalised treatment with therapeutic de-escalation or intensification for aggressive tumours can be decided depending on the response to Neoadjuvant treatment. Thus, knowledge of the predictive factors of response to neoadjuvant treatment would permit to anticipate and adapt care.

The intestinal microbiota is a true microbial organ, playing a major role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Some bacterial species have been identified and suspected of playing a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Among these species, genotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (CPEC) strains such as colibactin (cyclomodulin encoded by the genomic islet pks) are preferentially detected in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), especially the most aggressive forms. Recent studies show that the intestinal microbiota is a prognostic factor in the response to certain chemotherapies or immunotherapies, but little work has been done on its potential influence on the effectiveness of radiotherapy. This suggests the possibility of using these biomarkers associated with response to neoadjuvant treatment.

The objective of this project is to determine in a non-invasive manner (fecal samples) the predictive value of the intestinal microbiota and the presence of genotoxin-producing bacteria on the response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. This could lead to a better understanding and selection of patients for tailored treatment in rectal cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
220

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Hérault
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34298
    • Puy De Dôme

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically proven lower and mid-rectal adenocarcinoma at clinical stage II and III
  2. Patient is to receive neoadjuvant treatment (radiochemotherapy or chemotherapy or radiotherapy). Induction chemotherapy such as folfox or folfirinox is allowed
  3. Patient who has signed the informed consent of the study
  4. Male or female ≥ 18 years old
  5. Appropriate contraceptive measures should be used by both men and non-menopausal women before entering the trial until at least 8 weeks after the last course of radiochemotherapy. The investigator should inform the patient about the contraceptive measures to be used.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Antibiotic treatment at the time or in the month preceding stool sampling
  2. Presence of an ostomy
  3. Previous treatment for rectal cancer
  4. Patient not affiliated to a French social protection system
  5. Patient not in favour of good compliance with treatment for psychological, family, social or geographical reasons
  6. Legal incapacity (Patient under curatorship or guardianship)
  7. Prior radiation therapy or pelvic curia in the year prior to inclusion
  8. History of other cancers in the last 5 years (except for in-situ cervical carcinomas and non-melanoma skin carcinomas treated optimally)
  9. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Biological collection

Fecal samples collected at different times : During inclusion consultation with surgeon, after neoadjuvant treatment and before surgery,

In parallel to this fecal collection, standardized clinical data will be entered into a database
Other: Biological collection
Fecal samples collected at different times : during inclusion consultation with surgeon, after neoadjuvant treatment and before surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The ratio between the proportions of poor response to neoadjuvant treatment in populations so-called "exposed" (patients colonized by bacteria producing toxins (cyclomodulin) and unexposed (patients not colonized by bacteria producing toxins)
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli colonization rate before and after neoadjuvant treatment
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Change of cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli prevalence before and after neoadjuvant treatment
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Change of prevalence forming the overall bacterial composition before and after neoadjuvant treatment
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Change of colonization rate (in addition to cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli) forming the overall bacterial composition before and after neoadjuvant treatment
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Relative risk of poor response to neoadjuvant treatment in colonized patients with other bacteria ("exposed") compared to non-colonized patients ("unexposed")
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Proportion of patients colonized according to the modality of the clinical variable age
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Proportion of patients colonized according to the modality of the clinical variable gender
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Proportion of patients colonized according to the modality of the clinical variable body mass index
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Overall survival in colonized people by the different types of bacteria that form the overall bacterial composition (including cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli) compared to non-colonized people
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Disease-free survival in colonized people by the different types of bacteria that form the overall bacterial composition (including cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli) compared to non-colonized people
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Specific survival in colonized people by the different types of bacteria that form the overall bacterial composition (including cyclomodulin-Producing Escherichia Coli) compared to non-colonized people
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years
Types of other bacteria forming the overall bacterial composition before neoadjuvant treatment
Time Frame: About 1 years
About 1 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Philippe Rouanet, MD, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PROICM 2019-14-MIR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings