Pilot Study on the Use of Hydrocortisone, Vitamin c and Tiamine in Patient With Sepsis and Septic Shock

October 5, 2023 updated by: Cristina Martinez
Due to the high incidence, mortality and short and long term complications of sepsis and septic shock, it is necessary to look for strategies to try to minimize this impact.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Based on the current literature, we can affirm that the decrease in ascorbic acid levels in patients with sepsis and septic shock is directly proportional to the evolution to multiorgan failure and inversely proportional to survival. After assessing the safety in the administration of ascorbic acid as well as the decrease or almost abolition of its impact at the renal level after the association of thiamine, and the synergy provided by the administration of hydrocortisone, it is decided to implement the "Metabolic Resucitation Protocol" and assess its impact on our septic patients

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Girona, Spain, 17007
        • Hospital Dr Josep Trueta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients> 18 years of age with diagnosis of septic shock and multiorgan failure admitted to our Unit
  • Entry into the ICU once diagnosed with sepsis and / or septic shock. The first 24 hours after admission to the ICU will be established as an inclusion limit
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Coexistence of other types of shock at admission
  • Limitation of therapeutic effort or ICT (Conditional Intensive Therapy) upon admission to the ICU. It refers to patients in whom, prior to admission to the ICU, it was decided not to perform any or some of the usual treatment measures for sepsis, or in which a time limit is established in which in case of non-response they would withdraw intensive measures. This limitation will be indicated by your treating physician and if it exists, the patient would be excluded from the study.
  • Patient with a history of previous intake of ascorbic acid, thiamine or corticosteroids in the month prior to admission to the ICU
  • Patients considered immunodeficient (More than 10 mg of prednisone or its equivalent per day in the last 2 weeks, immunosuppressive therapy or diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment of septic shock
Conventional treatment of septic shock according to current management guidelines
Drug: on crystalloid fluid and Tranexamic acid
Resuscitation with crystalloids, Performing culture battery, antibiotic therapy
Other Names:
  • clinical practice intervention
Experimental: Current management plus ascorbic acyd,thiamine and vitamin C

Conventional treatment of septic shock according to current management guidelines associated with:

i. Hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours for 7 days or until discharge from the ICU with subsequent withdrawal in descending pattern for 3 days ii. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 1.5 gr diluted in 100 ml of 5% SG every 6 hours for 4 days (16 doses) iii. Thiamine 200 mg diluted in 100 ml of SG 5% or SF 0.9% every 12 hours for 4 days iv. Measurement of vitamin C levels prior to administration of the first dose of vitamin C
Drug: red blood cells transfusion, tranexamic acid (TXA) and fibrinogen concentrate
Phase III, randomized, multicenter, open-label and parallel group pilot study, which aims to study mortality at 28 days of admission in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual driving
Other Names:
  • experimental intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimate and compare hospital survival after 28 days of admission in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual management
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of patients that are alive after 28 days of admission
28 days
Compare mortality at 7, 14 and 28 days after admission in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual management.
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of patients that are exitus at 7, 14 and 28 days after admission
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the days of admission to the ICU in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual management.
Time Frame: 28 days
number of days that patient stay in ICU department
28 days
Compare the days of mechanical ventilation in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual management
Time Frame: 28 days
compare the days of use of mechanical ventilation in every arm
28 days
Compare the days of need for vasoactive drug requirements and doses in patients with septic shock treated with usual management and patients treated with ascorbic acid, thiamine and hydrocortisone added to usual management.
Time Frame: 28 days
compare the days of need for vasoactive drug requirements in both groups
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cristina Martinez

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Juliana Gonzalez, MD, Hospital Dr Josep Trueta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EudraCT number 2018-000196-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings