Novel Cardiac Signal Processing System

February 10, 2022 updated by: BioSig Technologies, Inc.

Novel Cardiac Signal Processing System for Electrophysiology Procedures

This study is designed to collect parallel intracardiac signal data during pre-defined periods of clinical interest from the PURE EP system and the existing signal recording and mapping systems.

The collected signals will then undergo BLINDED, CONTROLLED evaluation by unbiased electrophysiologist reviewer(s) to determine whether the PURE EP signals provides additional or clearer diagnostic information.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cardiac electrophysiologists rely on the display of electrograms when performing electrophysiology (EP) studies and catheter ablations in patients with arrhythmias. To achieve effective outcomes without complications, it is vital that the recording system enables the recognition of clearly abnormal (scared myocardium) and normal electrical signals.

Current recording systems have limitations in that it can be difficult to clearly distinguish a true cardiac signal from noise or artifact. This is particularly true when pacing the heart and when ablating abnormal myocardial tissue, components of the conduction system or epicardial structures. Therefore, improvement of the fidelity of signals obtained from EP recording systems is needed to enhance identification of the most effective targets for ablation.

There are several standard electrophysiology recording systems in use today, such as the commonly used GE/Prucka CardioLab recording system ("Prucka") which would benefit from additional features in order to improve the ability to record, discriminate and analyze signals from the heart. BioSig Technologies, Inc. ("BioSig") has developed an electrophysiology signal processing system, the PURE EP™ System, which may allow electrophysiologists to better characterize arrhythmogenic tissue during ablation procedures. Specifically, the PURE EP™ System's higher sampling rate and higher dynamic range allow improved visualization of low amplitude signals, especially those temporally situated near low frequency, high amplitude signals or large high-frequency signals.

This multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational study will involve at least five patients undergoing elective cardiac ablation procedure for tachycardias such as atrial fibrillation, atypical atrial flutter, ischemic ventricular tachycardia, or symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The existing recording/mapping system clocks will be synchronized to the PURE EP clock prior to each procedure. At the beginning of the procedures, all systems will be optimized for best signal display based on the physician preference. During the ablation procedures, annotations will be captured on the PURE EP system based on pre-determined clinically relevant events defined in this protocol (example - before and after successful ablation therapy).

After the procedures, parallel signal data samples will be harvested from all the systems using the procedure annotations and the time stamps as a guide. Once the signal data is harvested, cleaned, and organized, the individual signal samples will be reviewed in a blinded, controlled fashion by a group of independent, unbiased electrophysiologist(s).

Selected signal sample sets (from the same date and time stamp) will be separated in the survey and arranged in random order. The reviewer will be asked specific and identical questions relevant to each set of signal samples, but the individual samples will be separated and randomized across a full survey containing many different signal samples from many different procedures. The signal survey will be created under the direction of the Principle Investigator. The selection of the independent EP reviewers will also be done under the direction of the Principle Investigator

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
        • St. David's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Any person indicated and consented for an elective cardiac ablation procedure who is >18 years of age.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for cardiac ablation treatment
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to electrophysiology study or ablation
  • Enrollment in any other ongoing arrhythmia study protocol
  • Active Infection or sepsis
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • < 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PURE EP 2 Group
Enrolled and consented patients who are indicated for and receive an elective cardiac ablation procedure using the PURE EP 2 system for monitoring and collection of intracardiac electrogram signals.
Device: PURE EP 2
Enrolled patients receiving cardiac ablation treatment using the current standard of care with additional monitoring and intracardiac electrogram signal collection via the PURE EP 2 system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safe and effective use of the PURE EP 2 system based on system specifications and recorded within the Case Report Form (CRF).
Time Frame: Throughout the cardiac ablation procedure

The primary aim of this study is to further establish the safe and effective use of the PURE EP System during cardiac ablation in the EP Laboratory in a post-market environment. The PURE EP System will be installed to run in parallel to existing mapping and recording systems already in use in the EP lab. Each system will be optimized for viewing intracardiac signals based on the physician preference. The existing systems will serve as the primary method of viewing intracardiac signals and the PURE EP system will be redundant.

The intracardiac signals from the PURE EP system will be compared to existing recording and mapping system signals generated in real-time during each ablation procedure. The PURE EP system signals will be monitored by the physician investigator and a company clinical representative to validate the PURE EP 2 system runs as intended based on the system manual and meets expected standards for displaying signals.
Throughout the cardiac ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the quality of the PURE EP 2 intracardiac signals when compared to existing recording and mapping systems as determined by controlled survey of blinded, independent expert electrophysiology reviewers.
Time Frame: After the collection of signal samples from at least (5) subjects and until study completion

The secondary aim of this study is to assess the quality of the PURE EP intracardiac signals and the associated clinical relevance of the signals when compared to other sources of intracardiac signals. During the ablation procedures, annotations will be captured on the PURE EP system based on clinically relevant events defined in the protocol.

After the procedure, parallel signal data samples will be harvested from all the systems using annotations and the time stamps as a guide. Once the signal data is harvested and organized, the signal samples across multiple procedures will be reviewed in a blinded, controlled fashion by 2-3 independent, unbiased expert electrophysiologist(s).

The sample survey will be created under the direction of the PI.
After the collection of signal samples from at least (5) subjects and until study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
BioSig Technologies, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PURE EP 2.0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Collected intracardiac signal samples will be shared with the independent electrophysiologist reviewers, other physician investigators, and possibly other study collaborators like a biostatistician and clinical research organization.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrhythmia

Clinical Trials on PURE EP 2

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings