3-D Super Resolution Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging
High Frame Rate 3-D Super Resolution Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Carly Sronce
- Phone Number: 9199663262
- Email: carly_sronce@med.unc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Desma Jones, CCRC
- Phone Number: 9198439463
- Email: desma_jones@med.unc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Univeristy of North Carolina Chapel Hill
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Healthy Volunteers
Inclusion Criteria
- Able to provide informed consent
- Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria
- Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
- Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
- Severe congestive heart failure
- Unstable angina.
- Severe arrhythmia
- Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Cardiac shunts
Breast Imaging Patients
Inclusion Criteria
- Women
- Patient had a diagnostic breast ultrasound study performed at UNC
- Scheduled for a core needle or surgical breast biopsy of at least one breast lesion that is 2 cm or less in size and 3 cm in depth from the skin surface
- Able to provide informed consent
- Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
- BIRADS score of 4 or 5.
Exclusion Criteria
- Male
- Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
- Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Sonographically visible breast lesion larger than 2cm or greater than 3cm in depth from the skin surface
- Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
- Severe congestive heart failure
- Unstable angina.
- Severe arrhythmia
- Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Cardiac shunts
Thyroid Imaging Patients Inclusion Criteria
- Patient had a diagnostic thyroid ultrasound study performed at UNC
- TIRADS risk score of 4c or 5
- Scheduled for a core needle or surgical thyroid biopsy, fine needle aspiration, or thyroidectomy of at least one sonographically visible thyroid lesion that is 3 cm in depth from the skin surface
- Able to provide informed consent
- Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria
- Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
- Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
- Severe congestive heart failure
- Unstable angina.
- Severe arrhythmia
- Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Cardiac shunts
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Breast Imaging Cohort
A total of 15 women with known breast lesions that are already scheduled to undergo a clinical biopsy
|
Perflutren will be administered in split doses using the dosing range and administration type IV bolus) within the perflutren prescribing information.
When administered as a bolus, the package insert recommends 10 uL/kg patient weight administered within 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10mL saline flush with a second dose of 10 uL/kg patient weight 30 minutes following the first dose, if needed.
Other Names:
Acoustic angiography imaging involves a research ultrasound scanner as well as conventional b-mode ultrasound to guide the location of the imaging. The conventional ultrasound will be conducted just prior to the acoustic angiography for localization. Imaging will be performed within the package insert guidelines for ultrasound system mechanical index (a measurement of output power) when imaging perflutren contrast agent (less than 0.8). Acoustic angiography imaging will be performed by trained medical personnel using mild compression to eliminate motion. Total imaging time is estimated to be less than 15 minutes. |
|
Experimental: Thyroid Imaging Cohort
A total of 15 participants with known thyroid lesions that are already scheduled to undergo a clinical biopsy
|
Perflutren will be administered in split doses using the dosing range and administration type IV bolus) within the perflutren prescribing information.
When administered as a bolus, the package insert recommends 10 uL/kg patient weight administered within 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10mL saline flush with a second dose of 10 uL/kg patient weight 30 minutes following the first dose, if needed.
Other Names:
Acoustic angiography imaging involves a research ultrasound scanner as well as conventional b-mode ultrasound to guide the location of the imaging. The conventional ultrasound will be conducted just prior to the acoustic angiography for localization. Imaging will be performed within the package insert guidelines for ultrasound system mechanical index (a measurement of output power) when imaging perflutren contrast agent (less than 0.8). Acoustic angiography imaging will be performed by trained medical personnel using mild compression to eliminate motion. Total imaging time is estimated to be less than 15 minutes. |
|
Experimental: Healthy Volunteers Cohort
A total of 15 participants will be included to optimize imaging parameters.
|
Perflutren will be administered in split doses using the dosing range and administration type IV bolus) within the perflutren prescribing information.
When administered as a bolus, the package insert recommends 10 uL/kg patient weight administered within 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10mL saline flush with a second dose of 10 uL/kg patient weight 30 minutes following the first dose, if needed.
Other Names:
Acoustic angiography imaging involves a research ultrasound scanner as well as conventional b-mode ultrasound to guide the location of the imaging. The conventional ultrasound will be conducted just prior to the acoustic angiography for localization. Imaging will be performed within the package insert guidelines for ultrasound system mechanical index (a measurement of output power) when imaging perflutren contrast agent (less than 0.8). Acoustic angiography imaging will be performed by trained medical personnel using mild compression to eliminate motion. Total imaging time is estimated to be less than 15 minutes. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography; Breast Imaging (Percent of Negative Scans)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions.
Specificity was calculated based on the formula, which is true negative / (true negative + false positive).
|
Baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography; Thyroid Imaging (Percent of Positive Scans)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of know thyroid lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions.
The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment.
No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.
|
Baseline
|
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography; Thyroid Imaging (Percent of Negative Scans)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known thyroid lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions.
The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment.
No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.
|
Baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography; Breast Imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions. Sensitivity (%) = True Positives (TP)+False Negatives (FN)True Positives (TP) |
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve of Acoustic Angiography (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
To compare the area under the curve (AUC) of acoustic angiography to the AUC of the B-mode ultrasound.
Readers assigned a malignancy likelihood score from 1 to 5, with 1 likely benign to 5 likely malignant.
An AUC was then calculated based on these scores.
The Receiver operating curve (ROC ) was then plotted from this curve, and the AUC was estimated from the ROC curve.
|
Baseline
|
|
Radiologist Preference (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
To compare radiologist preference of acoustic angiography (AA) to conventional b-mode ultrasound, for each lesion characteristics which are shape, margins, and vascularity, were examined. Radiologists rated their preferences on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1 strongly preferring conventional ultrasound and 5 strongly preferring AA. Shape, margin, and vascularity values appear to represent mean or median rather than counts. We should select either the mean or the median and provide the standard deviation, which will be 0 if all radiologists assign the same score. |
Baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Breast (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography relative to conventional ultrasound in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions for both modalities.
Sensitivity was calculated based on the formula, which is true positive / (true positive + false negative).
The ratio between the sensitivity of AA over the sensitivity of conventional ultrasound was then calculated.
|
Baseline
|
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Breast (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography (AA) and conventional ultrasound in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions for each modality.
Specificity was calculated based on the formula, which is true negative / (true negative + false positive).
The ratio between the sensitivity of AA over the sensitivity of conventional ultrasound was then calculated.
|
Baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Thyroid (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
To compare (using a reader study) the sensitivity of acoustic angiography to the sensitivity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of known thyroid lesions for predicting malignancy.
The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment.
No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.
|
Baseline
|
|
Specificity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Thyroid (Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
|
To compare (using a reader study) the specificity of acoustic angiography to the specificity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of known thyroid lesions for predicting malignancy.
The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment.
No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.
|
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yueh Lee, MD, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- LCCC1915
- R01CA220681 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.