Efficacy of Near-Assisted Learning (NAL) in Improving Students' Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Grades (SRMC)
Efficacy of Near-Assisted Learning (NAL) in Improving Students' OSCE Grades: A Single-Blinded RCT
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Qassim
-
Al Bukairiyah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia, 51941, PO Box 777
- Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1st year medical students.
- Medical students of Sulaiman Alrajhi Colleges.
- Males.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students of other academic levels.
- 1st year medical students of other universities.
- Females.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Near assisted learning group
Participants in this arm were supervised by the trained peer-instructors.
|
Students randomly allocated to this group were overseen during sessions by trained peer instructors.
|
|
No Intervention: Self directed learning group
Participants in this arm were practicing independently.
They were not supervised by any instructors.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) Score
Time Frame: Less than a month
|
After the sessions, the study sample participated in the final osce exam.
Their scores were compared.
The minimum value was 0 while the maximum value was 100.
The higher the score the better students had performed
|
Less than a month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Hoiby P, Muller CG, Ringsted C. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):553-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701682550.
- Shah I, Mahboob U, Shah S. Effectiveness Of Horizontal Peer-Assisted Learning In Physical Examination Performance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):559-565.
- Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination? BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 11;13:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-165.
- Riaz I. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):825-9.
- Haist SA, Wilson JF, Brigham NL, Fosson SE, Blue AV. Comparing fourth-year medical students with faculty in the teaching of physical examination skills to first-year students. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199802000-00020.
- Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007 Apr;41(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02713.x.
- Tai JH, Canny BJ, Haines TP, Molloy EK. The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;21(3):659-76. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
- Liew SC, Sow CF, Sidhu J, Nadarajah VD. The near-peer tutoring programme: embracing the 'doctors-to-teach' philosophy--a comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors. Med Educ Online. 2015 Sep 8;20:27959. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27959. eCollection 2015.
- Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):469-84. doi: 10.1111/medu.12898.
- Khaw C, Raw L. The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 12;7:188-94. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b.
- Cole JD, Ruble MJ, Donnelly J, Groves B. Peer-assisted Learning: Clinical Skills Training for Pharmacy Students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6511. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6511.
- Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):577-82. doi: 10.1080/01421590701469867.
- Silbert BI, Lake FR. Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):392-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668240. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SRMCOSCE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.