The INVIGORATE Trial: A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.
The INVIGORATE Trial: A Randomized, Double-masked, Crossover Design, Vehicle-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Cliantha Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race
- have at least a two-year history of moderate-to-severe ragweed-induced allergic conjunctivitis based on principal investigator's judgement
- have a positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen within the past year of screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- known contraindication or hypersensitivities to any components of the investigational product medication or components
- history of uveitis, blepharitis, dry eye syndrome, herpes simplex keratitis, or herpes zoster keratitis;
- presence of any ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or active ocular inflammation (e.g., follicular conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis) within 14 days prior to screening
- presence of any chronic ocular degenerative condition or ocular inflammation that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to worsen over the course of the clinical trial;
- diagnosis of moderate-to-severe pinguecula or pterygium (particularly if it results in chronic erythema), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, significant conjunctival scarring, chemical burn, herpetic or neurotrophic keratitis, Cryopyrin Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS), or keratoconus
- woman of childbearing potential who is pregnant or nursing
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
|
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution dosed in the Environmental Exposure Chamber.
|
|
Active Comparator: Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)
|
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) dosed in the Environmental Exposure Chamber.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score Assessed Over 110 to 210 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber
Time Frame: The efficacy assessment period was 110 to 210 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.
|
Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for ocular itching on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = severe).
The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods.
The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.
|
The efficacy assessment period was 110 to 210 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Conjunctival Redness Score Assessed Over 12 to 212 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber
Time Frame: The efficacy assessment period was 12 to 212 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.
|
Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = extremely severe).
The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods.
The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.
|
The efficacy assessment period was 12 to 212 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ADX-102-AC-017
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.