Type and Frequency of Nasal Irrigation in Rhinosinusitis Patients

January 19, 2020 updated by: Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Isotonic vs Hypertonic Nasal Irrigation and Frequency of Irrigation Per Day in Rhinosinusitis Patients

Rhinosinusitis is a common clinical problem with significant morbidity which alters patients' quality of life that has its effect on 1 out of 7 adults. It has been found that rhinosinusitis accounts for almost 26 million clinics and emergency visits per year in United states .Nasal irrigation is standard management used to treat a variety of sinonasal diseases. Furthermore, nasal irrigation decreases the need of usage other medications in rhinosinusitis .Hence, it is considered safe, inexpensive, and easy to use with no evidence of major adverse effects .Up to our knowledge, there is no clear guideline in which type (isotonic saline vs hypertonic saline) and frequency (times per day) of nasal irrigation are superior and better.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nasal irrigation is one of the main treatment of sinonasal diseases. The mechanism of action of nasal irrigation has many physiological aspects such as removing of excess mucus which is a potential medium for bacterial growth and infection, cleaning of antigens and biofilm to decrease inflammatory process, increase mucocilliary function and removing curst and debris from post-surgery to enhance wound healing and mucosalization Hypertonic saline is defined as a solution with more than 0.9% weight per volume of sodium chloride while isotonic saline is defined as a solution that equals to 0.9% weight per volume of sodium chloride. There are controversial studies in the literature on which saline is superior on the other, some prefer hypertonic saline over isotonic saline because it can move water outside the cells, decrease edema of mucosa, increase hydration of sol layer and decrease muco-adhesiveness and improve mucociliary clearance while others found both solution had same efficacy, improved nasal stuffiness and nasal obstruction but patients prefer isotonic saline because it is well tolerated and less burning sensation. Frequency of nasal irrigation per day is poorly studied in the literature with no known recommended times per day. Our aim is to find which type of saline and number of irrigation per day are better and statistically significant .

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Saudi Arabia
    • Eastern Province
      • Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia, 31952
        • Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 years of either gender
  • Acute and chronic rhinosinusitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of nasal or sinus surgery
  • Age less than 18 years of either gender
  • diagnosis other than rhinosinusitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Isotonic saline with frequency of 2 times per day
0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for 2 times per day. Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 200 ml of 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Drug: Isotonic Saline ( 0.9% Sodium Chloride Saline)
0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for two groups. (first groups 2 times per day and second group 5 times per day ). Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 500 ml of 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Active Comparator: Hypertonic saline with frequency of 2 times per day
3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for 2 times per day. Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 200 ml of 3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Drug: Hypertonic Saline ( 3% Sodium Chloride Saline)
3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for two groups. (first groups 2 times per day and second group 5 times per day ). Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time). So, in total 200 ml of 3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Active Comparator: Isotonic saline with frequency of 5 times per day
0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for 5 times per day. Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 500 ml of 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Drug: Isotonic Saline ( 0.9% Sodium Chloride Saline)
0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for two groups. (first groups 2 times per day and second group 5 times per day ). Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 500 ml of 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Active Comparator: Hypertonic saline with frequency of 5 times per day
3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for 5 times per day. Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time) . So, in total 500 ml of 3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .
Drug: Hypertonic Saline ( 3% Sodium Chloride Saline)
3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used as nasal irrigation for two groups. (first groups 2 times per day and second group 5 times per day ). Each time, amount of 50 ml of saline will be used in each nostril ( 100 ml for both nostrils per time). So, in total 200 ml of 3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) saline will be used daily for 1 month .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 .
Time Frame: Change from baseline of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) at 1 month

The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a validated chronic rhinosinusitis -specific outcome measure consisting of 22 items that captures sinus-specific and general health-related impact of the disease process.

To answer the instrument, patients suggest their level of affection in each domain and identify the most 5 important items. Each item quantifies symptoms severity from 0 (no problem) to 5 (worst symptom). The sum of each item results in a maximum score of 110 while the minimum is 0 . High score indicates poor outcome.

Arabic version of a validated and reliable SNOT-22 will utilize in this study. We will measure the change of SNOT-22 from our baseline after follow up in 1 month
Change from baseline of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) at 1 month
Change in Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscopy Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline of Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) at 1 month
Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscopy Score (POSE) is objective endoscopic scoring system was utilized to assess the surgical outcomes in the sinonasal cavities through the evaluation of the middle turbinate, middle meatal antrostomy,ethmoid cavity, and secondary sinuses.The sum of maxiumum score is 20 while the minimum is 0 . High score indicates poor result . Th We will measure the change of POSE from our baseline after follow up in 1 month
Change from baseline of Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) at 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mohammad H Albar, MD, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-2019-01-262

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings