Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Insertion
Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Supreme Insertion in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
- Asan Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are scheduled transurethral bladder tumor resection under general anesthesia
- 20-79 years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≤3
- Patients who are voluntarily agreed to this clinical study
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of difficult airway
- Expected difficult airway by physical examination
- Unstable teeth or teeth loss
- Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30)
- Recent history of upper respiratory infection
- Patients who are not fasted or who are at risk of aspiration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Evaluation with 14 cm high pillow
When inserting laryngeal mask airway, head elevation is performed using a 14 cm high pillow.
|
Laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients who undergoing transurethral bladder tumor resection
|
|
Active Comparator: Evaluation with 7 cm high pillow
When inserting laryngeal mask airway, head elevation is performed using a 7 cm high pillow.
|
Laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients who undergoing transurethral bladder tumor resection
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First attempt success rate
Time Frame: Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
The rate of success at the first attempt of laryngeal mask airway insertion
|
Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The percentage of glottic opening score
Time Frame: Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
The percentage of glottic opening by fiberoptic view
|
Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
|
Laryngeal mask airway insertion-related patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At postoperative 6 hours
|
A seven-point Likert scale
|
At postoperative 6 hours
|
|
Second attempt success rate
Time Frame: Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
The rate of success at the second attempt of laryngeal mask airway insertion
|
Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
|
Third attempt success rate
Time Frame: Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
The rate of success at the third attempt of laryngeal mask airway insertion
|
Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
|
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
Time Frame: Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
Oropharyngeal leak pressure is measured as follows: After setting the expiratory valve to 30 cmH2O at a fixed gas flow rate of 3 L/min, the maximum inflation pressure is measured when a noise of gas leakage is heard in the oropharynx via a stethoscope.
|
Immediately after mask airway insertion
|
|
Reposition rate
Time Frame: After mask airway insertion (up to end of surgery)
|
The rate of reposition after laryngeal mask airway insertion when ventilation is ineffective or air leaks
|
After mask airway insertion (up to end of surgery)
|
|
Complications associated with laryngeal mask airway insertion
Time Frame: Up to postoperative 3 days
|
Complications related with laryngeal mask airway insertion such as cough, vomit, aspiration, regurgitation, bleeding, laryngospasm, and bronchospasm
|
Up to postoperative 3 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Horton WA, Fahy L, Charters P. Defining a standard intubating position using "angle finder". Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jan;62(1):6-12. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.1.6.
- Mohta M. Head elevation beyond sniffing position - An aid to airway management. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):247-248. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_173_17. No abstract available.
- Katsiampoura AD, Killoran PV, Corso RM, Cai C, Hagberg CA, Cattano D. Laryngeal mask placement in a teaching institution: analysis of difficult placements. F1000Res. 2015 Apr 29;4:102. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6415.1. eCollection 2015.
- Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Kadoya T. The sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial angulation than simple head extension: a radiological study. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Feb;54(2):129-33. doi: 10.1007/BF03022009.
- Jun JH, Baik HJ, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chang RN. Comparison of the ease of laryngeal mask airway ProSeal insertion and the fiberoptic scoring according to the head position and the presence of a difficult airway. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Apr;60(4):244-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.4.244. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
- Park JY, Yu J, Hong JH, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Head elevation and laryngeal mask airway Supreme insertion: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Mar;65(3):343-350. doi: 10.1111/aas.13742. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-0020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.