Genetic Testing for All Breast Cancer Patients (GET FACTS)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Laura S. Dominici, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

This study is designed to determine the impact of a novel genetic counseling method on surgical decisions in individuals with newly diagnosed breast cancer

This research study involves an expedited and surgery-specific form of genetic counseling.

The names of the study methods involved in this trial are/is:

  • Quantitative genetic counseling (discussion is guided by tables and graphs)
  • Standard genetic counseling

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study interventions including evaluations and follow up visits

  • After receiving genetic testing, participants will be placed into one of two counseling methodology groups:

    • Standard genetic counseling: Standard of care discussion
    • Quantitative genetic counseling: Discussion is guided by tables and graphs.
  • Participants will be on the research study for up to six months, with an optional extension to two years.
  • It is expected that about 450 people will participate.
  • This research study is a Feasibility Study, which is the first-time investigators are examining this form of genetic counseling.
  • This is a randomized study. Randomization means being put into a group by chance. It is like flipping a coin. Neither the participant nor the Investigator will choose the group the participant is assigned to.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis (invasive or in-situ) considering genetic testing
  • Patients with good understanding of written and spoken English
  • Patients with apparent cognitive capacity to make surgical decisions for themselves
  • Patients who are medically cleared for surgery
  • Patients must be at least age 18 but under 79

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous breast cancer diagnosis (invasive or DCIS)
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Patients who have received prior broad-based panel testing (prior BRCA1/2 testing with negative results allowed)
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Known medical or surgical contraindication to contralateral mastectomy
  • Hematologic malignancy necessitating skin biopsy/fibroblast culture for germline genetic testing malignancy other than cervical cis or basal or squamous cell skin cancers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Quantitative Genetic Counseling

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study interventions including evaluations and follow up visits - After receiving genetic testing, participants will be placed into one of two counseling methodology groups:

-- Quantitative genetic counseling: Discussion is guided by tables and graphs.
Behavioral: Quantitative Genetic Counseling
Quantitative genetic counseling: Discussion is guided by tables and graphs.
Active Comparator: STANDARD GENETIC COUNSELING

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study interventions including evaluations and follow up visits - After receiving genetic testing, participants will be placed into one of two counseling methodology groups:

-- Standard genetic counseling: Standard of care discussion
Behavioral: Standard Genetic Counseling
Standard genetic counseling: Standard of care discussion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient's assessment of their personal contralateral breast cancer risk
Time Frame: 1 month
A short survey, self-developed in conjunction with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute professional survey core, will be used to compare changes in patients' personal contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk assessment after quantitative versus standard genetic counseling. The question reads: "By the time you turn 80 years old, what do you believe is the chance you will develop cancer in the other (unaffected) breast?" and answer options are in 10% increments (ie. 0-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%). Their individual assessment of their risk will be collected before and after genetic counseling and will be compared to CBCRisk (for those without gene mutations) or ASK2ME (for those with gene mutations).
1 month
Change in patient's propensity to choose bilateral mastectomy as determined by a short self-developed survey question
Time Frame: 1 month
Patient's will be surveyed about their personal propensity to choose a bilateral mastectomy as the surgical treatment of a unilateral cancer before and after quantitative vs. standard counseling. This survey question was self-developed in conjunction with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute professional survey core. The question reads: "How likely or unlikely are you to choose surgery to remove both breasts (bilateral mastectomy) for your cancer in one breast (unilateral or one-sided breast cancer)?"s answer options include the following: "Very unlikely, Somewhat unlikely, Unsure (neither likely nor unlikely), Somewhat likely, Very likely).
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Genetic Testing Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 Months
Breast cancer patient satisfaction with genetic counseling practices,comparing the delivery of results by quantitative counseling versus standard counseling, as measured by the Genetic Testing Satisfaction Survey (GTS).
6 Months
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Rate
Time Frame: 6 Months
CPM rates will be measured and compared between patients who undergo quantitative versus standard genetic counseling.
6 Months
Level of anxiety among participants, as measured by the PROMIS anxiety scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Patients' level of anxiety will be compared between quantitative versus standard genetic counseling to monitor that we are avoiding undue stress on the patients. We will use the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) anxiety scale. Scores can range from 8-40, with 40 indicating worse anxiety.
6 months
Number of participants with decisional regret (testing and surgery choices)
Time Frame: 6 months
Decisional regret will be measured and compared between quantitative versus standard genetic counseling, for both the decision to undergo genetic testing and the surgical choice that was made.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tara King, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-509

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to Sponsor Investigator or designee. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Belfer Office for Dana-Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovation@dfci.harvard.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings